Honestly, I did not find that particularly convincing. Lot of typos and leaps in logic. The point is probably kind of true?!?

Honestly, I did not find that particularly convincing. Lot of typos and leaps in logic. The point is probably kind of true?!?

Oops. Yes html 5

XHTML was going to be so awesome. And then HTML 4 happened. :(

You ok? Looks like you just spaced out there for a solid minute

Corn syrup and water.

All I remember about vbscript was that array indexes started at 1.

I love typescript, especially for larger projects and libraries.

It’s missing a lot of things that people really care about (with good reason) like static typing. But I think a lot of dislike also comes from it being more of a functional programming language and not object oriented. I like it because it’s like scheme or lisp but with a C like syntax that I find easier to read. I also like that I can do dynamic stuff with websites. In some ways it’s the perfect scripting language for the web. Just as messy and unpredictable as html.

Yeah, true

I mean that is the first step. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ The next step is to start defining the types more strictly than any.