Probably how many people clicked on what url. There are probably some information about those, the more trivial would be from where in the world they are and how they got there (following a link, being redirected or having entered it manually)

More complicated stats would include estimated age, gender etc, if available

Despite that, I have and will donate to Wikipedia and the Wikimedia foundation, because they host knowledge and quite a lot of pictures. And I love it.

That looks cool

American police: they think they know what the law is.

I don't think karma gets aggregate. You just up and downvote posts and comments and that's it. It doesn't reflect back on the submitter.

Those points are even more meaningless here. Nothing to gain, but experiences and discussion. Hopefully.

You are doing fine!

If you have the need to nest 5 levels of for-loops, I suggest taking a step back and rethinking your approach, my friend.

Even if that other approach is just refactoring it into separate methods.

Maybe I'm not comfortable anywhere then ...

Yes I would like to know too.

I'm gonna out myself here, I like Coldplay. Haven't really gotten into the new stuff, but Viva la Vida, fix you or everglow are among my favourites.