funkyb

joined 1 year ago
[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Yea that's not explained better than a math teach. They just swapped notation common in math, for notation common in one specific programming language. it's only easier for the audience who happens to be familiar with programming in general, and that language in particular.

[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't understand why people frequently say this. While it's true you can pay money for them, I've never spent a dime on reddit and have given out over 50 golds and have enough coins to give out a half dozen more. I don't know what the mechanics are for earning the coins I have, all I can say is I haven't paid for any of them yet I do have them, so it's not true that when someone gives an award it was paid for with real money.

[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that, or just use the mobile page which is designed for such narrow aspects.

[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

no it isn't. My interest in Lemmy is not romantic and if you do agree with this, get out and engage people in person more often.

[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

hard disagree. This isn't black and white, you can do some of both and that is not wrong or unprincipled. Thinking otherwise is just simple minded.

[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

any mods that rolled over to continue doing an unpaid job just to retain some form of power are bitches.

Personally, I don't believe that POV is fair. As someone who, with a small group of friends, started a sub that has grown to 100k people and is the most active internet community for a niche gaming segment - i personally think it's not that easy to judge. I have not been active on my sub in years, and I leave the job up to the new guard, but I can completely respect the decision to want to keep something you invested in building alive and a positive influence in the area it affects. It's easy to armchair QB stuff like this and judge others decisions, but to just generalize and say "better to die than to think something else is better in the bigger picture" is a bit of a cop out imo.

[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I posted this in Ask Lemmy but since it didn't get traction I'm gonna piggyback on the visibility of this thread:


As i learn my way around ActivityPub based services, what stands out to me the most is federation is very much exposed to the users. (That, or I still just haven’t wrapped my head around the architecture details and how they manifest in terms of user experience.)

Am I just misunderstanding this, or would the end-user experience be more fluid and functional if the federation mechanics were mostly ‘under the hood’. What I mean by that is - right now if there’s a community I would enjoy participating in that is located on a different instance, in order to do that I need to (a) know it exists in the first place, (b) know what instance it is on, and (c) explicitly tell my instance about its address in order to join.

Would it be possible to have some form of master index (replicated across instances - not a centralized service) along with a public standard for registering an instance/community on the index? And if something like that existed, couldn’t that push what is an inherently more technical detail to lower levels of the implementation, and make for a simpler UX by allowing every instance to expose a more complete list of communities to users from directly within whatever instance they choose to use?

[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And what is it with the narrow aspects? I totally get the need for mobile support, but the default desktop view looks like it's trying to play nice with old 4:3 aspects. If that's the root design goal, I sure hope we can let that design goal die. In a 16:9 maximized window there is so much wasted real estate it pains me.

[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"Created for Lemmy" isn't really a thing, all you need is to implement the ActivityPub protocol. Whether or not it has any relationship to Lemmy has no bearing on if it can talk to instances using Lemmy's implementation.

[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sure but anyone can implement something using the activityPub spec and federate with other instances regardless of what flavor they're using.

[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

not sure that solution is a good one for this environment. I'm new but from what i've seen the concept of moderation is different and your solution is trying to engineer a reddit-like moderation design to an architecture that is fundamentally not reddit-like. Moderation here is at the instance level, not the community level.

[–] funkyb@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there are are lot of idiots, a lot. I don't know how to fix that, so I just ignore them and move on.

view more: next ›