Cry.

I thought the idea of questions were that they would prompt answers, not people rushing in to openly debate and bring up arguments that weren't asked. Hey, maybe you ought to ask a question on here that is open to that?

Cool story. Bye.

I can't wait to see the statistics of how many vehicular manslaughter cases and suicides related to abruptly driving your car into solid barricades, ditches or trees will be because of this.

There's a reason on the doors or windows there are openings and closings. Nobody is going to roll the red carpet out for you with 10 minutes left because they know all that you're going to do is waltz in and take time beyond 10 minutes.

It's even more funnier that:

• You willingly made an account on here

• Took time out of your day to read this magazine, click on this post and make a comment

• Come out thinking you're the righteous one when you've had all of the choice in the world to simply not say anything

Okay, I'll stick to an OS that currently don't have that feature and still got a few years left of extensive support. Of which I'll still be on said OS even if support truly ends, by which comes time to consider upgrading, Microsoft will already be on the next Windows version.

See how your blatant and baseless assumption falls apart? Idiot.

I can make a pasta meal under $6 that's generally made to last. The only determining factors is what additives you can add to it. My poor man's meal consist of the pasta (those $1 ones at wal-mart), tomato sauce (my choice has always been Tomato/Basil/Onion kinds) now the fun part is the additives themselves.

I've gotten imitation crab legs ($1 for the snack kind), croutons, chopped turkey franks .etc anything. You can just add damn near anything to the pasta that'll get you through a bit. I've only recently been adding frozen chopped spinach to the dishes, boil them up, dump them in.

All for a reasonable price. I don't usually pay anymore than $8 for a complete meal.

I've always felt that it should be the lifetime of the creator and if there's no heir established to carry the reigns of the IP - then public domain. Companies like Disney love to lobby and push that number and have pushed that number to ridiculous lengths so that it's like 500 years (exaggerated since we know it's like 90+).

Because say the creator dies, they have not picked a heir or that they don't have anyone to entrust with, with their IP. It gets funneled through the state's laws of inestate succession.

However, what we mostly have seen is when an owner does give up the rights and it's in the hands of greedy mongrels like Disney. What happens is that the IP is just in a cycle of re-release hell just to keep whatever trademark or copyright alive, doesn't matter about the quality which is usually shit.

And in the video games industry, we've seen copyrights to games that will never see the light of day. Copyrights and IP rights get hot potato'ed all the time because there's so many people involved that it complicates things whenever a creator dies or vice versa. It's why we haven't seen digital releases for No One Lives Forever 1 and 2.

So, copyright has unnecessarily made things complex to where IPs are just used as extensive methods of profit, some of which aren't even being directed to the original creators. Which makes me feel like copyright should just be the lifetime of the creator and then outsourced to public domain.

Because this is not Reddit where regurgitated, repetitive garbage is reposted ad-nauseum. If you're going to say "Reddit is more forgiving...wah" then here's an idea - GO BACK TO REDDIT AND STAY THERE!

He is a discount Tony Stark. Where he wishes he was as cool as Tony and comes up with things Tony did. But is no where even close to being that.