coffeetastesbadlikecoffee

joined 3 weeks ago

I really like my era. Pocketbook allows me to have the website of a local bookstore as the "shop" button on the home screen, so I can support them. It is comfortable to hold and the front light is pretty good.

In the summer months when I don't use the backlighting, I need to charge it every 2 weeks with very heavy reading or even 2 months with light reading (~20 mins a day)

Neo Hitler is getting strike 1 out of 3 out of the way

We truly live in Oktavias universe. Except at least there they only elected the faschist once.

Funny. This is how I foung out my ISP newly started blocking sci-hub. It was working about a month ago, now I had to turn on a vpn.

[–] coffeetastesbadlikecoffee@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Cities skylines 2

 

I can't imagine anyone EVER going "Hmmm, I bet people would appreciate autosave being disabled by default to save a miniscule amount of storage space, we shouldn't even prompt the player to choose during setup" I just spent like 3 hours in a new map and it just crashed. It's all gone. I am devastated. I will now cry myself to sleep.

In my area it's the rent prices mainly.

*AI powered self-raping child on the blockchain

[–] coffeetastesbadlikecoffee@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Could this legitimately be used as a captcha? I just tried it and I can't imagine a bot doing it. I wonder if there is a way to implement it without impacting accessibility though.

[–] coffeetastesbadlikecoffee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah please someone explain the memes

[–] coffeetastesbadlikecoffee@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This looked very confusing:

[–] coffeetastesbadlikecoffee@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also don't forget to restore test, otherwise you may as well not do backups. I have a reminder for once a year to test them, not just if it works but also what the performance is just in case.

376
Climate mystery rule (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by coffeetastesbadlikecoffee@sh.itjust.works to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Ok so apparently it is an article, not a bulletpoint of the other article as the ui would suggest. According to the article, some model made a while ago predicts we should only be at 1.3% warming this year and not 1.5%. That missing 0.2% is whats the mistery, so kind of misleading headline, especially if you put it in a place that doesn't make it look like an article at all. I only found out because I accidentally clicked on it.

The article (npr.org)

view more: next ›