clove

joined 3 days ago
[–] clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Theu don't verify emails and the CEO has even suggested we can use a random string. Also, you can pay with Bitcoin. No forced KYC anywhere along the way.

[–] clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

Eh, doesn't discouraged me from using em. For me is them or Google. As those are the only two useable engines for my type of surfing.

[–] clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Hmm, so no firewall in the router blocking ports, instead blocking happens on the actual client?

[–] clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (8 children)

How does IPV6 makes port forwarding possible?

[–] clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well, I'm talking about my use case which involves my own threat model. Regardless if it matches yours or not, it's still a complain I can share about the current state of browsers.

[–] clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Great for anonymity but has the same security baggage that gecko based browsers havem

[–] clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Like I said, security is what I'm talking about. Brave browser, as much as I dislike the company is the best compromise when looking for both.

[–] clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just not what I've read from security engineers or other sources like GrapheneOS devs. A lot of the flaws on mobile also apply to desktop. Just turns out engineering man power is a huge deal for secure browsers.

[–] clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (4 children)
[–] clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago

Lile they say, perfection is the enemy of privacy! Kagi has been the best as an engine out of all I've tried. If a better competitors comes up, I'll give em my money.

view more: ‹ prev next ›