clara

joined 1 year ago
[–] clara@feddit.uk 111 points 4 months ago (11 children)

n = 40, this is junk. they couldn't even get 100 people for this?

these were all sampled from 1 company in amsterdam. the differences could be explained by company culture, or local culture, or whatever. more work needed.

[–] clara@feddit.uk 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

here you go:

two chihuahua sized dogs, standing on a table, dressed in construction worker costumes, as if they are surveying construction blueprints

more can be found like this, @chichi__charlie in any good web browser

[–] clara@feddit.uk 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it's an example of simpson's paradox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson%27s_paradox

a worked example: if england/scotland/wales all use heart ❤️ 49% and use tears of joy 😂 at 51%, and then northern ireland was to use heart ❤️at 100%, you can imagine this would tip the whole uk over

even more freaky, you could make all 4 constituent countries use heart ❤️ at 49%, make each constituent use a different unique emoji 👍😀🥰😼 at 51% each, and then the aggregate would show that heart ❤️ is still the most used across the UK

now consider for each place on this map, they are ranking more than just 2 emojis. the map itself says that tears of joy 😂 is only scoring 5% worldwide, and that's 1st place. with margins of 5% and under to be deemed winner, it's no wonder funky effects show up

[–] clara@feddit.uk 3 points 6 months ago

aww it's like hardstyle shuffle rave phat pants!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1yCZ_iHPfg

[–] clara@feddit.uk 11 points 6 months ago

ok, here's the context. (click here)

the source of this file, regrettably, is the daily mail. broken clocks and all that. i will link the "article" that the video file was from, but you will need a hazmat suit going in, for both the cookies/trackers and low quality writing

here's that source now. (click here)

for posters below saying they couldn't find this, i understand it. we all get different search results, it's possible you all got hugboxed and were unable to find the clip as a result

also, i don't care to discuss the topic, i only wanted to link the source, because you were all struggling with it. i like finding sources :)

have a nice day 🥰

[–] clara@feddit.uk 74 points 6 months ago

why would future humans bother bringing all these people back

i think it's worth reminding why doctors treat people now, in this time and space. they do it mostly because they want to save people. maybe a few do it for money, but past a certain point, the money isn't why you do it. i think it's a safe bet that doctors of a future would see these corpses as patients, and act accordingly. an analogy - think how we see heart attack victims as patients, and not how our medieval ancestors would have seen them (as corpses)

...literally nothing positive to contribute to the utopian future...

true, but, a good chunk of patients in hopsital today have nothing to contribute to society, and cannot contribute any more, whatsoever. we treat them anyway, because that's what we do. humans have consistently cared for others that are sick and have "nothing to contribute" throughout history, and that shows no sign of going away anytime soon

[–] clara@feddit.uk 37 points 6 months ago (2 children)

here's one example for you (click here) exploring igbo gender norms

here's a second report that's worth reading too (click here)

i don't have much knowledge about the other cultures suggested, others can provide info for those

[–] clara@feddit.uk 7 points 6 months ago

nice video, i'm glad i watched through the whole thing. it's good to understand the perspective

i have a lot of major hangups with the concept, and i don't see myself aligning anywhere close to these ideas anytime soon, but i think it's positive to be shown the principles of anarchy from someone who believes them, rather than a strawman version of anarchy by someone who does not

thank you for posting :)

[–] clara@feddit.uk 7 points 7 months ago

okay, here's al jazeera reporting on the ballistic missile, it's a one liner but it's something

this is a saturation attack imo, the question is, at what target?

[–] clara@feddit.uk 20 points 7 months ago (6 children)

citing abc news (link here), us official says 400 to 500 drones

unconfirmed reports of ballistic missiles in the air too, it's all osint right now so no good source on that yet, if i get one i'll add it as a reply

[–] clara@feddit.uk 126 points 7 months ago (4 children)

take a look here at the papa johns live activity meter next to the pentagon on google maps 🍕

papa johs activity at the pentagon, 2x the usual activity

[–] clara@feddit.uk 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

oh god they're actually doing it

 
2
issue 196 (codeberg.org)
view more: next ›