bungalowtill

joined 7 months ago

Gonna have to see those videos

I think that’s unlikely.

But I also thought Trump winning was unlikely,

So what do I know?

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

hm, so much…yet so little

But I hope you do know the content of your little collection here and know what a shaky case you have and what conclusions one could draw from that.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 days ago (3 children)

show me your proof that the oil industry paid for anti nuclear sentiment. And try to avoid right wing propaganda. then you may claim whatever you want.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

I’m talking about the Energy Companies

Edit: the claim that the oil industry paid anyone to stop nuclear is a right wing lie. Please look it up, I don’t have the nerve for it anymore.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

Jesus man, you want to end capitalism but fall for one of its biggest outfits? Also, right now there is just the capitalist reality and within that science tells us, that nuclear is economically not good enough to support the green transformation. I am fine with overthrowing capitalism, but till then we have to somehow manage with a reality that is inseparable from it.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Ah, you assume there’s (or will be) unlimited funds set aside to fight climate change?
If that is so, why not plaster deserts with solar panels and the oceans with wind turbines. Would go a bit quicker than the 10-20 years it takes to finalise one nuclear power plant. The nuclear hype has no scientific basis.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (11 children)

Yeah, no. Nuclear is a con. Don‘t believe and spread the energy industry‘s lies. They’re shitting on renewables, because they want consumers dependant on their crap which needs to be subsidised by the state because it’s not economically viable. Thank you.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

no, and please don’t start defending next to my house, thanks

what‘s this inclusive economy he‘s talking about?

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

when you are with your peer group and use sarcasm, you probably also don’t label it as such.

view more: next ›