bsammon

joined 1 year ago
[–] bsammon@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 months ago

Volla really needs to hire/assign some staff for their support forum The large pile of unanswered questions there does not inspire confidence in their product.

Maybe it's better in the German-language forums.

[–] bsammon@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 months ago

1998 isn't "originally" when Lycos started in 1994. That 1998 snapshot would be their "portal" era, I'd imagine.

And the page where you submitted your website to Lycos -- that's no different than what Google used to have. It just submitted your website to the spider. There's no indication in that snapshot that suggests that it would get your site added to a curated web-directory.

Those late 90's web-portal sites were a pale imitation of the web indices that Yahoo, and later DMoz/ODP were at their peak. I imagine that the Lycos portal, for example, was only managed/edited by a small handful of Lycos employees, and they were moving as fast as they could in the direction of charging websites for being listed in their portal/directory. The portal fad may have died out before they got many companies to pony up for listings.

I think in the Lycos and AltaVista cases, they were both search engines originally (mid 90s) and than jumped on the "portal" bandwagon in the late 90s with half-assed efforts that don't deserve to be held up as examples of something we might want to recreate.

Yahoo and DMoz/ODP are the only two instances I am aware of that had a significant (like, numbered in the thousands) number of websites listed, and a good level of depth.

[–] bsammon@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Lycos, Excite, AltaVista, and of course Yahoo all were originally web directories of this sort.

Both Wikipedia and my own memory disagree with you about Lycos and AltaVista. I'm pretty sure they both started as search engines. Maybe they briefly dabbled in being "portals".

[–] bsammon@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It would be great to have a lemmy interface that does not require Javascript (even if only for reading) I notice that old.slrpnk.net does not require Javascript to read posts.

Edit: the lemmyBB mentioned in other comments looks like it might be something I would prefer.

[–] bsammon@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay, it appears to be a very specific failure--I was able to respond to other comments in the thread but not the one posted by KD.

Now I'm thinking it's probably a Mastodon-to-Lemmy thing. KD's comment (appears to have) came from Mastodon.

[–] bsammon@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah... it works just fine in this post/thread. Anyone try it in the chessboard thread that I linked in my original post?

[–] bsammon@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

My first successful attempt at commenting on a comment 🎉

[–] bsammon@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Let's do a test

7
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by bsammon@lemmy.sdf.org to c/sdfpubnix@lemmy.sdf.org
 

I'm having difficulty replying to the comment in my post https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/745908 .

This was my first attempt at replying to a comment (I just had my first success creating a top-level comment on a post -- not sure if/how that's different)

Not sure if the problem I'm running into is because of my web-browser or system (Linux desktop), or because of something about the nature of the comment I'm trying to reply to (appears to originate in Mastodon-land).

Any ideas? Maybe someone feels like trying to respond to the comment and give me a "Works For Me" response?

Edit: It seems to work just fine in this post. Still interested if someone other than me could try replying in the other thread/post.