anticommon

joined 1 year ago
[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The whole simulation theory stems from observations about how fast technology is advancing as a whole, and kind of plays hand in hand with the fermi paradox. Either we are a special advanced civilisation that will continue to advance until we could in theory simulate an entire species/planet/civilisation or whatever or we are doomed to die out before we can advance enough to achieve either that goal or potentially other goals such as building replicating space exploration technology that might be capable of exploring/consuming/adulterating part of the galaxy or even the galaxy as a whole.

Both theories are basically an extrapolation of our current technological progression with some large assumptions made about the way things in this universe operate as a whole. I don't think they are particularly far fetched, but I also don't really see much evidence to support either being a possibility, except maybe the whole we are fucking up our ecosystem and heading towards some type of collapse before we get too advanced parts of the fermi paradox.

Another theory that I've heard which is really just a statistics thing is that it's most likely that we are an average civilisation that lasts an average amount of time in an average part of the galaxy and that it's likely we are right about in the middle of the total number of humans that has or will ever exist (about 100 billion came before us, probably another 100 billion to go) which could be a couple centuries or millenia left of human reign over planet Earth.

All being said, it's pretty likely that since the future hasn't happened yet we just won't know how it all turns out until it does. We're all just as uncertain as anybody else, and whoever preaches the gospel of kingdom come is just as ignorant as you and I.

[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I drive a lifted RAM and in the last twelve months three people have hit me. Two were in Subarus. One was drunk.

[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

As a designer who works closely with my boss, it actually works like this:

He does meetings 8 hours a day, 2hrs talking to me

I do site visits, design, meetings, solving problems, and 2 hrs a day of picking his brain so I can fit all of my shit into 10 hrs a day.

[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah but we just got 8" of rain and 70 mph winds during a freak December storm that took out half our power grid, how will Amazon-Clause find my house?!? 80 degrees warmer than it should be here and our snowman holding up the mail box melted!!!

[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

There are very few games from large companies that don't tilt favor one way or another. Generally speaking though there is usually some way around this and much more skilled players will do better, but joe schmoe after an awesome game will always end up on the shitter team one way or another next game.

[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bro I'm no beanstalk but being fat is absolutely not healthy.

There is something to be said about the health benefits of being comfortable in your own body, but you also don't have to be ashamed of yourself to realize that there are genuine benefits to losing excess body fat. You only do yourself a disservice by buying the idea that being big is a healthy and worthwhile goal to aspire to. Generally being overweight is a condition of compounding factors that may well be outside of ones ability to control, and I guess the first step to being healthier is to acknowledge these facts.

[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Well by that logic we either let them win or let them try and take it, at least by not letting them win there is a clear and moral resolution to the problem. Let them cry, and in jail for sedition if they feel angry enough about it.

[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Wow these Aflac commercials are getting real woke

[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read this as director. I was immensely confused as I read further

[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

I design labs and to be honest it ends up being kinda a mix of both unless we're talking some major FAB

[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Can we start saying that X is the platform formally known as Twitter?

It was born Twitter and it will die Twitter.

[–] anticommon@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be honest Lemmy is just the right amount of content for me, and generally high quality.

It has also gotten me out of my doom scrolling habits that were causing anxiety issues. Thank God for that.

 

We live in an age of misinformation, but it's not always on purpose. Sometimes we hear things or come to conclusions that end up becoming fact in our heads. Other times it can be malicious with intent to deceive or subvert. Sometimes it's in the middle.

Where do you draw the line with regards to people being wrong about things and feeling compelled to correct or respond to their wrongness?

Am I wrong?

view more: next ›