a1studmuffin

This article seems misleading. It uses the loaded Western term "selfie" to generate these images of different cultures smiling. If you use the term "group photo" instead, you get much more natural looking results, where certain cultures are smiling and others aren't.

I'm not against these changes, but aren't physical footy cards and other types of trading cards the original loot box aimed at kids? Or have companies successfully argued that they're selling chewing gum and the cards are just freebies in the pack?

... are you including me in that or just everyone else?

Smells like something IDF unit 8200 might have been involved with.

This has been the weirdest console generation. I'm still surprised they railroaded ahead with the PS5 and Xbox Series X launches right at the beginning of the pandemic.

I noticed this as well and agree with everything you've said. Hopefully it's something that can be easily addressed for the next version, I doubt there's many people that would prefer to keep it as is when the comments action bar is disabled by default.

If you turn on text labels for the navigation buttons, they reappear. So seems to be when the icons only are showing.

It's the same for people who don't understand basic electronics or mechanics. Any problem just becomes "it's broken" and the only solution is to take it to an expert and pay for their time, or toss it and buy a new one. It's expensive to be ignorant.

To kill any competition and ensure they retain control over future standards. Money. It's pretty straightforward.

The basic idea is that a huge company with infinite money creates software that supports an open standard, such as Threads. Next they spend significant amounts of money driving users to their software, rather than an open software equivalent. Once they've captured a huge percent of all users of the open standard, they abandon the open standard, going with a proprietary one instead. They'll make up some new feature to justify this and sell it as a positive. Because they control almost all of the users at this point, many of the users they don't control will decide to switch over to their software, otherwise the value of the open standard drops significantly overnight for them. What's left is a "dead" open standard that still technically exists but is no longer used. You can find plenty of past examples of this pattern, such as Google and XMPP.

This reminds me of the low-background steel problem: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel

I see this at my local supermarket chains after they received pressure to reduce plastic usage. The exact same plastic bags are in use, except now they have printed on them "REUSABLE PLASTIC BAG". Such a predictable outcome.