Zalack

joined 1 year ago
[–] Zalack@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is !lostlemmings a thing anywhere?

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

At a sketch:

  • We know that when the brain chemistry is disrupted, our consciousness is disrupted

  • You can test this yourself. Drink some alcohol and your consciousness will be disrupted. Similarly I am on Gabapentin for nerve pain, which works by inhibiting the electrical signals my nerves use to fire, and in turn makes me groggy.

  • While we don't know exactly how consciousness works, we have a VERY good understanding of chemistry, which is to say, the strong and weak nuclear forces and electromagnetism (fundamental forces). Literally millions of repeatable experiments that have validated these forces exist and we understand the way they behave.

  • Drugs like Gabapentin and Alcohol interact with our brain using these forces.

  • If the interaction of these forces being disrupted disrupts our consciousness, it's reasonable to conclude that our consciousness is built on top of, or is an emergent property of, these forces' interactions.

  • If our consciousness is made up of these forces, then it cannot be a fundamental force as, by definition, fundamental forces must be the basic building blocks of physics and not derived from other forces.

There are no real assumptions here. It's all a line of logical reasoning based on observations you can do yourself.

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Why would you assume consciousness is a fundamental force rather than an emergent property of complex systems built on the forces?

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago

More good options is always a good thing.

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not a treasure

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago

Thatsthejoke.jpeg.zip

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

In many cases it should be fine to point them all at the same server. You'll just need to make sure there aren't any collisions between schema/table names.

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not saying there aren't downsides, just that it isn't a totally crazy strategy.

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

Same. I write FOSS software in my free time and also paid.

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Man, I really think you should either saddle up, don't block ads, or use a free, non-ad-supported alternative.

Sync is made by a single dev who uses it as his main source of income. It's not made by a corporation. Taking the fruits of someone's labor, that they have priced to make it worth their time, feels kinda shitty to me.

If you really feel it's so much better than the alternatives that you won't even use them, then pay what the person making it feels they need to keep making it.

[–] Zalack@startrek.website 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You're being sarcastic but even small fees immediately weed out a ton of cruft.

view more: ‹ prev next ›