WitchHazel

The FBI demonstrated during the San Bernardino shooting investigation that Apple must purposefully put backdoors in their devices, as the FBI was able to independently crack the phone, which isn't possible without a backdoor or a security flaw so poor that a third-world hacker could access it with some level of effort or knowledge.

Do not trust Apple with your privacy, even less so than Google. At least Google will allow you to see everything they've collected on you and prevent random bad actors from accessing your data, which is something we can't be sure of with apple. This isn't about which is the more moral company, it's about which is more dangerous to the consumer. Complete lack of control over your computing environment will only make sense in cases where you're expected to have a complete lack of knowledge of computers and someone else does the thinking and manages your device.

I can legally destroy my own private property thank you very much

So instead of changing the laws you would rather...just let it happen? Alternatively, you don't have to obey the law. Enamel paint is very cheap and easy to apply to lenses. I think breaking the machines would curb their use, no?

As an interviewer, you do not have the elevated role necessary to determine if your method of interview results in better candidates, especially since you didn't try any alternatives beyond an automated code submission. This is intellectual dishonesty that serves to shelter the author from thinking critically about the affects their actions actually have.

I struggle to find very obvious things when using ddg, unfortunately
Feels bad

Mind sharing?

Okay, but in that situation we don't say that the market has punished that business. They should be hurt worse than they could any other way, so there isn't a possibility that they profit in net, or have a loss equivalent with legitimate business practices. Otherwise, there is no real deterrent to the behavior.

Yes lol

They could achieve complete political cogency by acknowledging the validity of leftist criticism, but they choose to instead wrap themselves up in more rationalizations.

It blows the liberal mind when Putin tells the truth.

Unfortunately a guy I know works for a gov hospital and they've used such technology for over a decade at this point. It seems unavoidable.

The training data here is exaggerated more, actually. This task should take kilobytes, max, and would finish in a fraction of a second. Also, no self-respecting ML engineer would put together an ML system without accounting for every data type.

Yeah I don't really get this, you can come to deterministic mathematic conclusions with ML, it just requires different structuring of the problem. While area of a rectangle may not need optimization, there are many such places that do, like file compression, which requires perfectly accurate results.