Tiresia

joined 3 months ago
[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

No, but it will increase the fraction of total global capital that is owned by the shareholders, and isn't that what really matters?

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

So what you want is that all a fossil fuel company needs to do to sabotage a climate movement is to endorse someone in it?

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wasting money on bad solutions is not the same as fucking it up completely.

Also, I don't know if you're being unrealistically optimistic or unrealistically pessimistic, but there are still deeper depths to sink to than just fucking up the climate. That still has a whole range from reducing the carrying capacity of the earth to 5 billion or to 5 million or 5 thousand or zero, and there are more or less horrifying ways to handle that drop too.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

Damn, this one of the big pushes of Extinction Rebellion Netherlands. Glad to see that unauthorized disruptive protest works.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

before riots

- the post title

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

Glad to see their talking points focus on food security rather than agricultural companies' interests like the EU. Though I wonder if they'll come to the sensible conclusion and cut down on the meat industry.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Latest*

It's not even a particularly bad one, compared to Dole coups, Coca Cola assassination, and Uniroyal napalming civilians.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 months ago

People have survived "deadly" wet bulb temperatures long before electric refrigeration. Air conditioning is a patch for colonial societies and those that emulate them that have stupidly built western European style (Cfb climate optimized) housing in tropical climates.

Universal solidarity doesn't just mean solidarity with the poorest US citizens, it means solidarity with the billions of people who don't have AC or a car. Giving US citizens who already have AC and a car free electricity will probably be less effective and less equitable than a more egalitarian degrowth-based distribution of resources.The OOP mentions electric cars, which are simply a luxury when public transit and utility vehicles (kei trucks, vans) exist. Air conditioning likewise can be a luxury when passive design exists. Cisterns, shade, plant respiration, air flow management, high roofs, large communal spaces that reduce outer surface area, etc.

People have a right to live a cool and comfortable life, but that does not mean the right to live in a nuclear family suburban home with paper-thin walls and not a tree in sight, basking in full sunlight, with AC on full blast, using your electric SUV to drive half an hour to the grocery store or school. A tropical longhouse shared with your community, a natural or artificial cave system, or living somewhere that isn't trying to kill you (as badly) can serve that purpose just as well.

So instead of pushing for free electricity for American citizens, I would much rather push for degrowth of the American economy, with smarter designs that simply need less electricity.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Hope and positivity are two different things. Hope dissociates from the present and the future, externalizing your care into an imagined future you can not affect. Empirically, people with hope fare worse psychologically than those without hope, because those with hope have no coping mechanisms when their hopes get dashed.

What we need is not positive news, but a positive life. Sit in a meadow, share meals with friends, be kind and generous, work at things that mean something to you, make art with passion, and rage during political protests.

When so much of the world's news and media are pushing a narrative of unending consumerism and growth, it is good to keep reminding ourselves with factual news that this world will collapse sooner rather than later.

If it helps, all life ends in misery, be it decreptitude, disease, ecosystems collapse, or all of the above. Life has never been about how it ends, it is about what we do while delaying the end. Everything we do for the future, we do for the future that will actually be, not for the future that gives us comfort to imagine.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

We can't stop all terrorist attacks. Preparation is good, but it's going to suck having loved ones die.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If capitalists can't take legally, they will take illegally.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago

Excuse me, it's called a flail.

(Also, while there are larp-safe flails, the 'chain' on those is short enough not to wrap around any limbs, because that can create hazards, so the one depicted here is unsafe)

view more: next ›