TheDemonBuer

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In theory, geoengineering should slow down the rate of warming while we transition away from fossil fuels. Since the transition to a zero GHG emission global civilization will inherently take more time than we have, to prevent warming beyond 2.0C, we could use geoengineering to buy us some time. In theory, it makes perfect sense, but I am leery. I'm concerned about potential unintended consequences and side effects, but I'm even more concerned that geoengineering will make people complacent, slowing down the transition. Even theoretically, geoengineering only works if we are rapidly transitioning at the same time, otherwise it's just like throwing more and more dynamite onto a pile, and all it would take is for us to stop geoengineering, for whatever reason, for the dynamite to explode.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Consumption of world’s wealthiest people also making it increasingly difficult to limit global heating to 1.5C

We're not going to achieve the 1.5C target. It's just not going to happen. Yes, it might (might!) still be physically possible to limit warming to 1.5C, but it's not economically, politically, or socially possible. The only way we could achieve 1.5C at this point would be if there was some major economic collapse or some other major crisis. There's no real way we can reduce GHG emissions at the rate necessary to achieve 1.5C while the global population, global economy, and average per person consumption rates continue to grow at their current pace. Some might say it is theoretically possible, but I don't really care if it is. We're not looking for theoretical solutions, we're looking for actual solutions, and I think the actual solutions get us somewhere between 2.5C and 3C.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Some men buy big trucks for the same reason some men buy sports cars or super cars, expensive luxury cars or classic cars. They're signifiers. They signify a man's masculinity and status, depending on how masculinity is defined in their culture. In some cultures, a big, powerful truck represents masculinity, in other cultures, where masculinity is more about wealth and class, it can be represented by a very expensive car. Cars have been used as signifiers by men pretty much from the beginning.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Fedora, so missionary position, but the lights are on and we're on top of the covers.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

I'm sure there are a lot of complex reasons. Frankly, I don't really care why other people don't use Linux, I use it. Exclusively.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

US State Department Spokesperson Matthew Miller later stated the US believes this step is "not productive at all" due to the UN's role in the region.

Wow, we are really taking a firm stance here. Israel better be careful or we might become slightly miffed, or maybe even peeved.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nintendo doesn't want you to play their games if you're not willing to follow their rules. Ok, that's their prerogative, but that means I will not be playing their games...at least not their new ones.

I prefer playing on my Steam Deck these days, and I really don't want to buy another handheld just to play Nintendo first party titles. I'm going to play some of my favorite classic Nintendo titles on my Deck using emulators and just not play the new stuff. I'm sure they're great games, but so what? There are lots of great games. I've got a huge backlog of great games already in my Steam library, and 20 more on my wishlist. If Nintendo some day decides to make their titles available for Steam Deck or PC, I'd consider buying them, but since that's extremely unlikely to happen, I think I'm just done with Nintendo.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Nintendo has burned through all the good will they developed with me when I was a kid in the 80s and 90s. I doubt I'll ever buy another Nintendo product again. Not that it matters to Nintendo, though. I'm many years removed from their target demographic. They make products for young people and that ain't me. I'm sure those younger Nintendo fans will keep supporting the company, but, as for me, I've got the classic Nintendo games I want and I'll keep playing them on whatever device I want. If Nintendo doesn't like that, they can kiss my whole ass.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Makes sense. Steam OS is Arch based, so Valve has a vested interest in it. Especially now that the Steam Deck is an unmitigated success.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Of course parents not taking appropriate precautions doesn't absolve the companies of responsibility. Unethical behavior is unethical behavior, even if there are things consumers can do to protect themselves from it. After all, the precautions wouldn't be necessary if the companies didn't engage in this behavior in the first place, so these precautions aren't really solutions only mitigations.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

I used to advocate for Linux, because I wanted more people to use it, so that more software devs would support it. I care a lot less about that since proton came to prominence. Linux still doesn't get all the support from devs that I want, but there's so much great software available now, both open source and proprietary, that I don't really worry about non Linux users anymore.

So use whatever OS you want, folks. I don't really care.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The irony is, something like this probably would have been a lot less expensive to make, while also appealing more to fans. It's funny how so many people in the movie business are not very good at, you know, the movie business.

view more: next ›