It's simple:

Beat the population into learned-helplessness,

& then all the AI molestingware that the device can run, can be running in it.

Desensitization/enforced-learned-helplessness.

It's just a conditioning-step, is all.

The profit is in having the population not have any privacy left, & living only within the neuromarketing-platforms that the mainstream operating-systems are becoming.

It's just a step in the suckerpunching humankind, is all.

_ /\ _

Try oats: they love eating the shoots.

When you buy "cat grass", it's oats.

Just get some whole oats from your local health-food store, & plant 'em, & let your friends eat the stuff to their hearts' content:

it'll do their health good, too!

_ /\ _

He understands.

So, East Germany, basically, with tech.

I'm suggesting you invest in reading a book on https://www.LeanPub.com called "Algebra-Driven Design".

the reason I'm suggesting it is that the complex-requirements you're being persecuted-by, are exactly the sort of thing that that book can help with.

( I'm presuming you code )

By creating the domain's algebra, & using meta-programming, you can prevent whole categories of bugs.

I only got part-way into the book ( I'm braindamaged, & have beenfailing to learn programming since the 1980's, when I lost 1/10th of my brain-volume ), but being able to create an APi with ZERO bugs in it, is part of what I'd seen in that book.

I'm a huge believer in keeping requirements divided into dimensions, & keeping those dimensions orthogonal, because once you fail in doing that, you're fscking doomed.

Here: got the link for you:

https://leanpub.com/algebra-driven-design

_ /\ _

Sorry, but air-quality damage from gas cooking & air-quality damage from burning cooking-oil have nothing to do with each-other.

Both create harmful air.

Cooking with electric stove ( induction seems to be the cheapest, next to microwave, in terms of energy ) removes the air-quality harm done by gas.

Burning cooking-oil harms air-quality no matter what heating-technology was used to produce the mistake.

_ /\ _

To the best of my knowledge, back-propagation IS learning, whether it's happening in a neural-net on a chip, or whether we're doing it, through feedback, & altering our understanding ( so both hard-logic & our wetware use the method for learning, though we use a rather sloppy implimentation of it. )

& altering the relative-significances of concepts IS learning.

( I'm not commenting on whether the new-relation-between-those-concepts is wrong or right, only on the mechanism )

so, I can't understand your position.

Please don't deem my comment worthy of answering: I'm only putting this here for the record, is all.

Everybody can downvote my comment into oblivion, & everything in the world'll still be fine.

You don't have to do ANYthing in order to have copyright on your images.

That is standard throughout the Berne convention & has been for decades.

Registering makes court-cases easier to win, but having copyright on one's renditions isn't in any way requiring that one have registered anything with anybody.

Wasn't there a competitor named Mattermost?

a FLOSS competitor?

Isn't Signal an option??

IF they've the horsepower to run it, I gather there is a reversal of Whisper, called WhisperSpeech, or something like that, which uses an LLM to convert text to speech.

...

Here: found it for you.

https://github.com/collabora/WhisperSpeech

it demands that I log in, to view the post??