[-] Palkom@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I vaguely recall a certain whisky-producing region having some sort of referendum at one point. Must have dreamt it, sorry.

[-] Palkom@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Just to underline what this comment is saying: this type of breakthrough was the wet dream of WW1. The race to the sea, where the western front was established, was based on finding a flank and turning it. That was the objective of most warfare up to that point, and it ended because they ran out of ground on which to turn a flank. Then they couldn't meaningfully break through the defenses (or layers of, to be more accurate), like we see Ukraine doing in Kursk. If they turn the flank, they'll have routing russians for days, and have achieved maneuver warfare again.

[-] Palkom@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Yoy got it, no buying produce.

[-] Palkom@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Well, you're not exactly contributing to a world where that insecurity is eliminated. And besides, you'll never win an emotional debate with rational arguments.

[-] Palkom@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

And if he manages to get one off the line, it'll go for 20 meters and then break down due to bearings and bushings being fouled.

[-] Palkom@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

It is a factory belonging to SKF, a swedish company that produces bearings. Famous for supplying bearings for use in tanks by almost every major power during ww2, and supply to the german side was finally cut off when SKF told the allies that the entire stock was for sale to anyone who paid. I believe the last payment was made by the US 10-15 years ago, finally settling the debt.

Since the war, SKF has grown into a very large supplier of the highest quality bearings, and saying its a factory making parts for weapons is a bit narrow. Bearings are used in most things that have rotating parts, and SKF is large in a lot of markets that aren't weapons. Their product catalogue is well over a thousand pages, for example.

[-] Palkom@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I agree and disagree, I guess. It's sad that so much money is invested in the military industrial complex, but since those weapons are used to fight an opressive and dictatorial regime in favor of democracy, I guess its better. Both Sun Tzu and Clausewitz refer to the use of an army as the continuation of the political process, and democratization of Ukraine is to many a worthy goal, as opposed to the growth of the Russian sphere of influence. Opposing Russia now might lead to a lower overall negative impact than if the same figth is had after Ukraine is annexed and Poland is next in line, but that's just a hypothetical.

[-] Palkom@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Press the X? Gotcha! I'll remove shorts for 30 days or until you come back without cookies in 10 minutes.

[-] Palkom@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

How can one gain your level of awareness?

[-] Palkom@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Because the thing holding it together is plastic and using plastic frivolously is frowned upon. The label tears so the turtles live. Convenience costs environment, deal with it.

Palkom

joined 1 year ago