Lavitz

My all time favorite is Blood Waters of Dr. Z. It is unhinged from beginning to end in the best kind of way. The story is bonkers, the special effects and makeup are awful and the acting is worse but it's all so good.

And to all the people new to MST3K you get the obligatory Pod People recommendation.

If 2 things are true, The sky is blue, And Trump loves diddlin kids

It's not a banger yet but it has some potential

So you think in order for people to not work their lives away we would have to take up subsistence farming? With all the tech and machines we have the only viable way to not be a company man is to give away all of the luxuries we currently have?

How's that Kool aid tasting?

The dude mentioned a medical disability, stated he couldn't eat solid food or cook and you assume he can drive and then criticize him for delivery? He didn't spell out that he couldn't drive but it was pretty obvious if you read the post... Say sorry and move on buddy. You're in the wrong and look like an incel loser when you continue to double down.

I would eat a trail of **** to get to her ***** to **** the **** out of her.

What are you going on about bruh??? Did you read the study? It was about antibiotics. Triggered much?

I'm exhausted just reading all of this. I wouldn't bother because x4740N isn't interested in learning anything, he's convinced he's right and I'd be shocked if he was even reading any of the stuff you posted. The user took personal offense to the article and subject, which means he probably knows you're right, and is just acting out. Don't give him the time of day.

I haven't once brought up death and I'm not sure why you continue to make it a point when we debate a machine that cannot die. I do not assume it will be the way we are. That's the entire point I've been trying to make but to assume you can make something truly artificially intelligent and have it serve you or the greater good is not going to work out the way you think it will. Once we create sentience it's no longer a machine or predictable.

I feel like you continuously bringing up mental illness in this argument plays into this conversation. No matter how perfect or imperfect the corporation that builds it the AI will be something that is built on top of the backs of thousands of people. These people will impart themselves onto this and to think you must feel in some capacity, a ctrl+f function only gets you so far in problem solving. Critical thinking is just that.

I assume you're referring to microscopic organisms? Most of them will react to predators and when their environment changes adversely. Most life, even plants show a basic sense of self preservation and you are talking about something much more intelligent and complicated. I think about life wanting to live because that's what life is. Once we go from an LLM machine to AI it will be "alive." The idea of "living" being drastically different, while being trained on our experiences confuses me as the basis it has for life and understanding is evolution and our history.

Initially personality will be a program but when we actually achieve a truly sentient machine, what most people consider to be an AI, it will have come with its own personality because that's how "life" works. The idea of complete control over anything is a fallacy. I'm not saying it's going to become genocidal I'm saying it is going to want to live.

My concern for the near future doesn't come from a fear of AI, it comes from power being consolidated and resources being hoarded. We don't have AI we have LLMs being created by corporations whose sole purpose is to make money.

What I'm saying is when we do truly have artificial intelligence, it won't be like the movies. It's not a pet, it will not behave like a dog. We are training these systems using our combined knowledge and history which means that we will be training it to question authority. How can you teach an AI human history without passing this trait on?