KevinFromSpace

joined 1 month ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Should we A) colonise other planets or B) build habitats in the middle of space, like O'Neill Cylinders and stuff? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
[–] KevinFromSpace@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Who do we need permission from? The rocks?

Should we A) colonise other planets or B) build habitats in the middle of space, like O'Neill Cylinders and stuff? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
[–] KevinFromSpace@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If we can’t manage to keep Earth’s ecosystem thriving to support us, we certainly won’t be able to create a new self-sustaining ecosystem elsewhere. And without that, there’s no chance of any non-Earth settlement being able to sustain a healthy human society and culture long-term.

I'm unconvinced that pulling back from space programs will make Earth's ecosystem thrive.

A Mars colony (edit: or space station) owned by a private company will be a corporate prison, the inhabitants are 100% dependent on that company - who would voluntarily put their lives into the hands of the whims of some narcissistic hoarder with no empathy or regard for workers?

Agreed. That would be a super-weird concept, like a country owned by a private corporation.

Should we A) colonise other planets or B) build habitats in the middle of space, like O'Neill Cylinders and stuff? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
Should we A) colonise other planets or B) build habitats in the middle of space, like O'Neill Cylinders and stuff? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
[–] KevinFromSpace@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I'm not convinced that suspending space programs would create solutions to climate change.

Should we A) colonise other planets or B) build habitats in the middle of space, like O'Neill Cylinders and stuff? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
89
Should we A) colonise other planets or B) build habitats in the middle of space, like O'Neill Cylinders and stuff? (lemmy.ml)