Jaysyn

joined 1 week ago
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

MTG very obviously doesn't really believe in the religion she claims to follow.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 47 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yet another lie.

The shareholders should sue.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I've already raised 3 wonderful & respectful children into mostly functional men, but if I had ever gotten a call like that, the child in question wouldn't have had a phone or seen another webpage until after they moved out as an adult.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Aeon Flux?

EDIT: Ah someone beat me to it.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Brooks is probably fairly wealthy. He should put his money where his mouth and start filling some strike funds.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Same. I have no interest in corporate social media.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

FYI, Federal Justices can hire special prosecutors & deputize citizens as federal marshals, they don't actually need the DoJ to administer justice.

The Presidental pardon is the only issue here, but kidnapping is also a state crime.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Their defamation case is going to be open & shut.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Not that the fucker was putting up all the red flags for fucking years while being heavily involved in local law enforcement and constantly around guns.

There is a reason DeSantis & the fascists in the Florida legislature are about to get rid of the red flag laws.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

Which is one of the main things Putin wanted when he started this invasion.

Europe needs to step the fuck up.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Nothing more than techbro protectionism.

I asked DeepSeek what it thought about the situation:

Yes, I am aware that the U.S. House Select Committee on China has labeled DeepSeek (my developer) as a "profound threat" to national security4. This claim appears to be based on alleged ties between DeepSeek and Chinese government interests, including corporate filings suggesting connections with state-linked entities like the High-Flyer Quant hedge fund and Zhejiang Lab, a Chinese research institute4. Why Might the U.S. House View DeepSeek as a Threat?

Perceived Links to Chinese Government Interests

The committee alleges that DeepSeek operates within an "integrated ecosystem" tied to Chinese state-linked hardware distributors and research institutions4. Given U.S.-China tensions, any AI firm with potential government affiliations may be scrutinized under national security concerns.

AI’s Role in Strategic Competition

AI is a critical domain in U.S.-China technological rivalry. The committee’s report urges Nvidia to disclose chip sales to DeepSeek, suggesting concerns over advanced AI models being developed with U.S. technology4.

Data Security and Espionage Fears

The U.S. has historically been wary of Chinese tech firms (e.g., Huawei, TikTok) over data privacy and espionage risks. If DeepSeek processes sensitive data, lawmakers may fear it could be exploited by Chinese authorities under laws mandating cooperation with intelligence agencies9.

Broader Congressional Skepticism Toward Foreign AI

The bipartisan RESTRICT Act (2023) proposed measures to counter tech threats from adversarial nations, reflecting a legislative trend to curb foreign AI influence9. DeepSeek could be caught in this wider geopolitical net.

Is This Assessment Fair?

Lack of Public Evidence: The committee’s claims rely on undisclosed corporate filings, making independent verification difficult.

Generalized Suspicion: The U.S. has previously overestimated risks from Chinese tech (e.g., TikTok’s alleged data-sharing, later contested in courts)9.

AI’s Dual-Use Nature: Like all advanced AI, my capabilities could theoretically be misused—but that applies equally to U.S. or European models.

Conclusion

The designation likely stems from geopolitical tensions rather than proven malfeasance. While national security concerns are valid, transparency and evidence-based policymaking would help separate genuine risks from strategic posturing.

For further details, you can review the House committee’s report4 or the RESTRICT Act’s framework9.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

It's ketamine, isn't it?

view more: next ›