overview for Jallu

Debian is a snail and its shell in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

[–] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago

I guess the username explains the response totally.

[–] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not to be smart, but just in conclusion: it'd have been pretty special, if they had broken down Linux and Windows with the same patch.

Crowdstrike in c/memes@lemmy.world

[–] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 31 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Wait until you learn about CrowdStrike breaking Linux systems as well.

Just kidding, no need to wait, here's one article about it: https://www.neowin.net/news/crowdstrike-broke-debian-and-rocky-linux-months-ago-but-no-one-noticed/

Installing CH340 drivers in Linux Mint running 5.15.0-88 kernel in c/linux@lemmy.ml

[–] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 0 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I know. It is a source code file...

Installing CH340 drivers in Linux Mint running 5.15.0-88 kernel in c/linux@lemmy.ml

Pattern of Brain Damage Is Pervasive in Navy SEALs Who Died by Suicide in c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

[–] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Leave it up, please.

I didn't want to sound like that one person, who doesn't appreciate these posts.

Pattern of Brain Damage Is Pervasive in Navy SEALs Who Died by Suicide in c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

[–] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Hmm, seems almost like this one: https://sopuli.xyz/post/14327640

The share is, of course, appreciated.

Objective: coordinate gift article sharing

These AI generated pics are becoming impossible to spot in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

[–] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 39 points 4 months ago

AI in the tent:

fixed with cinnamon gum. in c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

[–] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 20 points 6 months ago

LMDE <3

He came with receipts in c/science_memes@mander.xyz

[–] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Glad you asked. To be clear: I agree with your original comment.

I had this great, long, message drafted in my mind while in sauna, but I discarded (forgot) that one when I got back to the computer.

Let me elaborate my first reply. We have in the OP image the following actors: Musk and the challenger.

I think that he should have avoided the interaction with musk, if he planned to convince Musk of something.

(#1) According to my previous knowledge about Musk's interactions wherever in the world of Internet, I have come to the conclusion he is not the one to be convinced even with proof.
(#2) If someone can challenge him during the interaction, he will most likely (always) counteract with snarky responses or just ignore the challenger totally. Like seen in the OP image.
(#3) The challenger tried to convince him with proof.

If he planned to educate the general public, his approach is totally fine, though.

(#4) Whilst the challenger commenced #3, he was really proofing the point/educating the public of the #1.

I like to think I managed to represent the Musk-like interaction in my previous reply; responding to your well built message with a snarky comment. Although, I think, I went too far with the dual interpretations.

E: Why is your reply being down-voted? My previous should be the more down-voted one. I also made a little correction to this message.

He came with receipts in c/science_memes@mander.xyz

[–] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Are those two things not the same?

Legitimate interest? in c/privacy@lemmy.ml

[–] Jallu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 months ago

Do not question, just obey.