FanBlade

joined 1 year ago
[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, I did read the comments.

Aside from perhaps a couple fringe exceptions, there is noting enshrined in law that prevents a felon from getting a job. A company may decide to not hire someone because they are a felon, that is their choosing and not a result of a law.

An individuals eligibility for running for president does not impact whether or not justice, as defined by our laws, is perused against them.

If I’m understanding correctly you think that criminals should not be eligible. It appeared that you were arguing that in our current system folks are able to be above the law because they are eligible to run from president. I was asking how someone’s eligibility causes them to be above the law.

I know things are very emotional now and that totally makes sense and perhaps is leading to the hostility of your comments. With that in mind I feel I have presented what I’ve set out to and will not reply to your further.

[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How does it result in that?

Being eligible to run for president is not a factor in someone being perused for justice.

[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 6 days ago

What was breathless about the article? Seemed pretty matter of fact in its presentation.

[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You call the other person a name

You don’t respond to anything they say directly

You do it twice in the same thread

You call something context without providing context

[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 2 months ago
[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com -3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Why are there quotes around that? Is that a quote from someone?

[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 4 months ago

Your use of sarcasm betrays the peace you have not found.

  • Some Porn Account
[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Acts obtuse about what the person above you said and then goes on a rant about it. This makes it seem more like you’re worried about opportunities to say what you want versus actually listening to others.

[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That’s what we thought until it turned out that Elmo was the real predator all along.

[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 5 months ago

Still not describing anything that indicates it backs it.

Good news though, I did reply again so feel free to condescendingly demonstrate your intelligence again.

[–] FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 5 months ago (11 children)

But it’s not backed by energy.

The energy was consumed in the process of creating the crypto, that energy no longer exists and since it doesn’t exist it can’t back anything.

view more: next ›