[-] EMPig@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think it's photosynthesis. 'Bury in the ground' is an extreme simplification btw. Also, I am finished with this topic scince long anough. It feels politically biased. If you'd like to reply, I'd hear it gladly. But I m not going to be involved into a discussion.

[-] EMPig@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

What is this? A new monetization model? Pay4Redempion?

[-] EMPig@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I'd rather fill land with trees than with radioactive wastes.

[-] EMPig@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

"Easier"? Are you aware of the fact that radioactive waste tombs are meant to stand for millions of years? It requres a lot of territory, construction and servance charges, and lots of prays for nothing destructive happens with it in its "infinite" lifetime.

[-] EMPig@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

And what do YOU know about radioactive waste disposal?

[-] EMPig@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I believe in Volvy. He will handle this.

EMPig

joined 1 year ago