187
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

We need to fight for beequality!

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I thought it said hug πŸ˜”

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I'm willing to commit to not shitting in your kitchen. πŸ’œ No thanks needed.

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I'm a queer anarchist πŸ˜‚ It's not that complicated. And yeah.. You start telling people they need to aggressively support something or get out.. I'm calling you facist.

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

☝️☝️☝️

πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

πŸ’œ

Fucking hilarious! I didn't get banned! Common mods, don't you stand by your values? I'm not "aggressively pro trans" or whatever so let's do this! Ban the ENBY.

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ENBY Anarchist here. I'll gladly take my ban.

πŸ€ŸπŸ˜ŠπŸ–• πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ Facist

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Blaaah, time to switch!

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just don't care πŸ™Œ

I seriously couldn't give two fucks about supporting influencers or tech companies. Uploaders can pay for the infrastructure for all I care. Like people use to host websites out of passion, now everything is about profits, and politics, why would I want to support that? Why should I give two fucks about making someone else rich?

Fuck that shit. You can get cracked copies of the YouTube App that give a much better experience.

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

The fact that they already have significantly better outcomes in terms of land stewardship compared to dominant groups.

Generalizations suck. Over 80% of Canada is undeveloped. And just aside from that, our ecological issues are far greater then land stewardship.

The fact that only those in a marginalized community will be able to effectively understand and create policy that addresses marginalization in meaningful ways.

I don't see how this is relevant.

The fact that nearly every truly meaningful radical idea has already come out of marginalized groups, and will, by all available evidence, continue to do so.

Oh really? EVERY truly meaningful radical idea has come out of marginalized groups? You're telling me white people haven't contributed at all? Seriously.. That's the position you're taking.

Ultimately my problem with everything you're saying is it's rooted in racism. I can't support that shit.

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

That's right, some critiques do make more sense then others! Gold star! 🌟

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Anyone can critique society.

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

The noble Savage trope is itself a racist trope that came out of colonial Europeans bigoted beliefs that indigenous could not possibly be civilized, and thus that any seemingly civilized points made by an indigenous person were actually made by Europeans as a critique of their own culture. Look into Kandiaronk and Lahontan. There is mountains of proof that not only did Kandiaronk exist, but that he directly participated in debates with the European governments that colonized the area he was from. There is Absolutely no evidence that any of what Kandiaronk said was anything other than his own words, yet the noble savage myth allows Europeans to claim that he couldn’t possibly have done so. So, no, I don’t think this is noble savage stuff, and I think the noble savage myth serves primarily to prevent meaningful critique from coming from outside of the dominant hierarchies by infantilizing indigenous people.

Regardless of what Kamdiaronk said I don't think it's right to stereotype indigenous people right here right now.

view more: next β€Ί

CorruptBuddha

joined 1 year ago