I've payed more than that for my Canon and while I do save all the RAWs I barely ever use them.
Why go through the hassle of developing the RAWs when the Jpegs look good already?
I've payed more than that for my Canon and while I do save all the RAWs I barely ever use them.
Why go through the hassle of developing the RAWs when the Jpegs look good already?
Yeah, Win10 can't properly handle the efficency cores. So it's either upgrade to Win11 or disable the cores. (Or play with terrible random stutters)
It's not running great but also not terrible on my rig (3070ti, 12700K, everything on high). I've heard that the FPS in the menu is somehow worse than in game.
Gonna stick with my unfinished CS1 city for now since I am playing highly modded and aiming for a beautyfull city rather than actually playing the game..
I am running Win11(pro) because the new Intel CPUs require it.
It's completely fine. I use Firefox without edge annoying me. There are no apps that just pop up out of nowhere (that I know of). It's fine. I locked down all the temeletry shit like I did on Win10.
The only thing annoying me is the change in the preview in folder icons. I wanna see the pictures that are in the folder not the. xmp files Darktable creates.
While telemetry is bad the problem here is probably that this windows service pings the server but doesn't get a response because it got stuck in your pihole. So it tries to pings again and again and again and again...
Koch renamed to Plaion last year btw
The lack of karma also makes it worse. Usually if I saw a discussion that felt kinda off I'd check the accounts age and karma. Made it easier to sniff out bots.
No problem.
I'd consider a 500€ camera to be in the mid range for hobbyists cameras. For example anything in the Canon X00 line really, like 800D or 850D.
Well, the speed of your autofocus depends on a variety of different factors. Lighting conditions, subject contrast, lens, focal range, af drive, af sensor type and processor speed are those I'd consider of the top of my head.
AF works slower in low light or low contrast situations because the camera has a harder time to figure out when the image is sharp. Lenses with a large focal range (like 150-600mm) need time to move the focus through that range, that's why they often have range limiters for quick focusing. Ultrasonic AF drives are generally faster and quieter than "traditional" drives. Mirrorless cameras focus using the captured image and software and need good processors to get a quick focus. DSLRs rely on specialised focus sensors.
Setting up a common test, eliminating all possible outside errors and testing a wide variety of cameras with an even wider variety of lenses seems unnecessary given that even most mid range cameras should have a pretty snappy focus these days.
It's definitely complicated. I used it for a couple of years and only now feel like I'm slowly getting the hang of it.
Can you share a link to that? I'm looking for a new light.