Rule nr 5 is kiinda bad, not a fan of that one. Everything is political, hell the rule "no politics" is a political statement
I think I get why, but then the seriousposting or like "no starting a flamewar" rules might be more applicable
Rule nr 5 is kiinda bad, not a fan of that one. Everything is political, hell the rule "no politics" is a political statement
I think I get why, but then the seriousposting or like "no starting a flamewar" rules might be more applicable
wisequote.org sure don't sounds so humble
ew ai
xkcd 154 Never really thought about someone not recognizing it, but I'll update desc and try to remember in the future
random chinese book?
what? whaddya mean? the fact that it exists?
or the fact that nintendo doesn't want it to "spread" Come here without defending big megacorpo or leave please
they are going after the developers that make it possible to play your emulated game....
they aren't selling all their games, and never have. ever wanted to play earthbound? you can't legally...
if you want to blame me for "rehashing arguments" then maybe look where you are first, and then read my comment. this isn't a place for respecting copyright, or corporations fighting against preservation.
feel free to check out my other comment on this post. where I link to nintendo using pirated roms and selling it back to us.
point is to stop giving the rich ass company any benefit of doubt.
how did lemmy piracy suddenly turn to defending nintendo...
nintendo pulls rom sites down, sure - it's their shit (https://www.pcworld.com/article/402404/nintendo-suit-rom-emulation-game-preservation.html)
Nintendo is using roms from these sites to sell to consumers within their own "ecosystem" (https://www.eurogamer.net/did-nintendo-download-a-mario-rom-and-sell-it-back-to-us)
Not even close to all of nintendos titles are avaliable on their online stores, and the mini-snes or whatever did not have even close to all their titles.
point is. Nintendo is NOT preserving their own games. And they sue anyone doing anything like preserving it for the public.
They've sued multiple times emulator developers, even when it's completely legal.
(it is 100% legal to emulate, and make emulators.)
Due to the fact that a court case is expensive AF, this usually just kills the emulator group.
we're mad at nintendo precisely because they do not, themselves preserve games. While they try to sue emulation and game preservers, they also use their ROMs and emulations to sell games to the consumer.
lol, the dog owners say that the parts of the bill not affecting them are good, and the farmers say the parts not affecting them are good.
easy solution. split the bill in two. one for dogs and one for farmers. both pass, and everybody's unhappy
Even the israeli newspapers are writing this. How anyone can defend this blatant genocide is beyond me.
It's just constructive critisism 😅