CanadaPlus

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, sometimes it happens. Lemmy was semi-broken during the APIocalypse, and there still isn't such a thing as a FOSS Facebook, or search engine backend for that matter.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 76 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And Linux/BSD are so good proprietary developers rip them off to whatever degree legally permissible.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago

Sort of? I think this was more of a "see, Americans agree, women are shit".

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

True, your policies don't have to make sense if you win.

That being said, this guy runs a fringe party. They have a whole 3 seats in the Diet's lower house and none whatsoever in the upper.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

It's the same in Australia. Something about the pacific must make parties switch places.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Pfft, he's doing an amateur job of intimidating, then. It should have been thumbscrews or something. This way seems self defeating.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I'm actually hella curious what the context was here. Why would he want any of that?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At least on the official web app, that doesn't render as a link. You've got to do it as [whatever](u/pageflight@lemmy.world)

whatever

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

!desire_paths@sh.itjust.works

Literally just put it in that way, for future notice - there's no hidden formatting here.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Question: what do you mean illegal in Canada? AFAIK the only extra laws here are already covered by rule 4.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If they have any sense they'll do Cuba first. It's just way too easy a win for a fascistoid government that's willing to actually deploy and likes red baiting.

I'm not even clear what the guerilla situation would look like in the post-Fidel era.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Mmm yes, big ass rotors to keep that solid gold/uranium/whatever frame off the seabed.

 

A link to the preprint. I'll do the actual math on how many transitions/second it works out to later and edit.

I've had an eye on this for like a decade, so I'm hyped.

Edit:

So, because of the structure of the crystal the atoms are in, it actually has 5 resonances. These were expected, although a couple other weak ones showed up as well. They give a what I understand to be a projected undisturbed value of 2,020,407,384,335.(2) KHz.

Then a possible redefinition of the second could be "The time taken for 2,020,407,384,335,200 peaks of the radiation produced by the first nuclear isomerism of an unperturbed ^229^Th nucleus to pass a fixed point in space."

 

Per the rules, this is the original headline. However, the interesting part is that he's preparing a Gaza offer that he says will be "final".

They've hewn very close to the whole "unconditional support" thing, so I'm curious what that means exactly.

 
 

In air. This seems like it should be incredibly basic information but I can't find it anywhere.

 

Just watched this and thought it was dope. I especially liked the Roman buffets and Foreman grills.

 

This is about exactly how I remember it, although the lanthanides and actinides got shortchanged.

 

Unfortunately not the best headline. No, quantum supremacy has not been proven, exactly. What this is is another kind of candidate problem, but one that's universal, in the sense that a classical algorithm for it could be used to solve all other BQP problems (so BQP=P). That would include Shor's algorithm, and would make Q-day figuratively yesterday, so let's hope this is an actual example.

Weirdly enough, they kind of skip that detail in the body of the article. Maybe they're planning to do one of their deep dives on it. Still, this is big news.

 

(I hope it's okay if I just keep posting stuff here)

This version of the multidirectional elevator is neat because it's not an exotic modern solution or just a concept, but an actual practical machine that's widely used. It's not quite fresh content but it holds up.

2
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org to c/transit@lemmy.world
 

The comments say it can run a lot faster, as you'd expect for the added complexity, but they don't usually use the full speed for liability reasons. I wonder if a version could be made that's fully enclosed.

 

Example: On here vs. on Lemmit itself.

I don't know if this is our end or theirs, but nobody seems to have commented about it on their meta community, which makes me think it's not broken for users on bigger instances.

view more: next ›