CamilleMellom

Money and freedom is quite nice :)

I appreciate the link. I am going slowly through the article that I find interesting because I like graphs and structure, but I have no idea if any of it holds for actual physics and I didn’t know the man before. Now I have a better idea of why people where answering this to this post (although it seems a little bit exaggerated) :).

Poke

I have used the exact sentence “broadcasting into the abyss” hahaha. It feels to me that everything is short lived and context-less

I have no idea how use mastodon effectively :/. Lenny has the advantage of article + discussion so there is a topic to follow. Mastodon/Twitter has always been too chaotic for me. Any advice on how to make it worth it and not just a massive mess x)?

https://pubpeer.com/ mentionned in the article is an interesting website that I will check out. However, peer review is supposed to be done by experts so I’m not sure how this website ensure that :).

I also found https://openreview.net/about interesting as a concept. Although it is a bit nerve wracking to have reviews public.

Such a stupid lie. A lot of policies are based today on this idea of nudges. I know in my company they tried to improve safety mindsets through that « science » and that it is all fake quite literally killed people.

I have no good advice for this but I’m sorry this is happening to you :(. That’s really not fair and very inconsiderate.

I would advise not training your own model but instead use tools like langchain and chroma, in combination with a open model like gpt4all or falcon :).

So in general explore langchain!

Rocky Linux, AlmaLinux, and Oracle Linux for example.

I think you are absolutely correct for the interpretation of the photon count :)

I Googled it to see because I thought they maybe were using event cameras then but no, they use 10bit instead of classic 8bit but they are not litterally counting photons (which would not be useful). It’s interesting that it improved the precision and recall of their « object detection model ». Guess the image is of better quality then.

The link from 2 years ago is not particularly impressive: https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2283 this is an equal valent paper I think from 2014