Bloodh0undJohnson

joined 8 months ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Warm beer and cold coffee are the same temperature in c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
The State of global Piracy - February 2024 in c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
[–] Bloodh0undJohnson@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm new to the concept of nukes, but generally I understood it as a wide concept from the linked wiki. I guess what I wanted to know if it would be possible to see more about why a user has flagged the certain torrent (e.g. the user has submitted some kind of report that malware was discovered when scanning the downloaded files). Maybe I'm overthinking this -- I nearly always am -- but I figured there may be situations where it could be interesting to know, similar to seeing an angry one star review on Amazon and instantly realizing the problem lies with the reviewer when you read the review.

In database form I think it would be most attractive if nukes could be categorized or if there was a possibility for a link to any user generated report on the torrent (but then again I have no idea about which source data you have available on any of this and to what extent I'm just fully misunderstanding "nukes")

Biden calls for 'immediate ceasefire' in Gaza in c/world@lemmy.world
The State of global Piracy - February 2024 in c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
[–] Bloodh0undJohnson@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Didn't know about this resource before. Good stuff.

Two questions:

Is it possible to get more information about nukings?

What percentage of the scene releases included in your stats above are actively seeded/healthy?

Biden calls for 'immediate ceasefire' in Gaza in c/world@lemmy.world
Google suspends Gemini from making AI images of people after a backlash complaining it was 'woke' in c/technology@lemmy.world
[–] Bloodh0undJohnson@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Any and all issues calling out wokeness as part of any problem immediately loses all credibility to me.

Agree.

If wanting to include other ethnicities in something, even if it's just to make the people with the money look better, I'm all for it.

Disagree, it's reasonable to criticize green, pink, whathaveyou washing even if there are many other worse things a company can do (discrimination, etc). I also think it's reasonable to find it offensive to depict Nazi Germany as a beacon of inclusivity.

Google suspends Gemini from making AI images of people after a backlash complaining it was 'woke' in c/technology@lemmy.world
[–] Bloodh0undJohnson@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago (5 children)

To be fair, the aggrieved images generated by the AI included people of various ethnicity pictured as Nazi soldiers.

I don't know though... to me, it seems weird that the criticism is focused on "wokeness" and misguided inclusivity. Shouldn't people be more concerned about these images being the result of demoing a technology for falsifying historic records in a hitherto unthinkable scale?