“until something works" At least you're doing a better job than some people.
Some leave it at will ai told me so. And they don't know better and put that into prod!
Well said. This is a very complicated subject that people always try to simplify down to a current issue at hand. There's never a true "right" answer, and isn't one that leaves all parties without some suffering.
Godspeed to all the brain dead idiots who will sign up for this, and will become even more literally brain dead after getting the implant.
I didn't know this was how adblockers and sites worked in general.
If the html file is on the users device and they overwrite it, via an ad blocker, that is in their rights as the property owner of the machine.
Seems like sites need to get creative in new ways to force ads, which I'm sure will be a different kind of intrusive, instead of trying to push their ownership into the space of the users systems.
Wasn't there a space fight with horses on the wing of a star destroyer in the rise of Skywalker?
Ok, but that's for the EC and for presidential and VP nominees by the EC.
In the dnc we have delegates with 1 vote for their nominee. If the delegates vote for 1 dem and another gets the 2nd amount of votes, then they'd be Pres and VP nominees for the dnc. Or actually do ranked choice for dnc nominees to get voter ranking of nominees.
How is it better for a presidential nominee to pick who they want vs listening to the peoples actual preferences.
How would nominating a dem VP by Dems via voting cause a civil war?
And if it's just for one party vs both, what would that be bad?
I get why it was changed for VP for the dem vs Republican nominee. But why wouldn't we want, as a party, better representation on who we voted for.
Maybe it's the time to go back to how things were when the US was founded. We have a vote and top two are President and VP nominees. Keeps the party aligned to what we actually care about and who we think is best, vs who the nominee or party thinks might be best.
More democratic this way
This is a bunch of pipe cleaners tied together. A bit less risky, more Ridgid than just string
I think this is pointing out the US agencies Aren't dumb enough to use an open source ai to try to generate code for hacking activities.
Ai llms have learned from us. Good and bad. It doesn't know the difference between good and bad unless you tell it.
So you have to know what's good or bad from the get go before using it and trusting it yet.
And some blindly trust ai already... Which its far from that level of trust