BB_C

joined 1 year ago
[–] BB_C@programming.dev -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is this going to be re-posted every month?

Anyway, I've come to know since then that the proposal was not a part of a damage control campaign, but rather a single person's attempt at proposing a theoretical real solution. He misguidedly thought that there was actually an interest in some real solutions. There wasn't, and there isn't.

The empire are continuing with the strategy of scamming people into believing that they will produce, at some unspecified point, complete magical ~~mushrooms~~ guidelines and real specified and implemented profiles.

The proposal is destined to become perma-vaporware. The dreamy guidelines are going to be perma-WIP, the magical profiles are going to be perma-vapordocs (as in they will never actually exist, not even in theoretical form), and the bureaucracy checks will continue to be cashed.

So not only there was no concrete strike back, it wasn't even the empire that did it.

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

systemd

Interesting. So they did it two years ago for the ~~lols~~.. i mean for the u8"πŸ˜€"s*...which wasn't even really needed as one of the PR comments pointed out.

* Yes, the mission creep is so bad the shit show that is systemd has emoticons.

[–] BB_C@programming.dev -4 points 3 weeks ago

Multi-threading support

Who stopped using pthreads/windows threads for this?

Unicode support

Those who care use icu anyway.

memccpy()

First of all, πŸ˜„.
Secondly, it's a library feature, not a language one.
Thirdly, it existed forever in POSIX.
And lastly, good bait πŸ˜„.

whats so bad about Various syntax changes improve compatibility with C++

It's bad because compiler implementations keep adding warnings and enabling them by default about completely valid usage that got "deprecated" or "removed" in "future versions of C" I will never use or give a fuck about. So my CI runs which all minimally have -Wall -Werror can fail with a compiler upgrade for absolutely irrelevant stuff to me. If it wasn't for that, I wouldn't even know about these changes' existence, because I have zero interest in them.

Those who like C++ should use C++ anyway. They can use the C+classes style if they like (spoiler alert: they already do).

I can understand. But why would you not use newer C versions, if there is no compatibility with older version β€œrequired”?

Because C doesn’t exist in a vacuum, and Rust exists. Other choices exist too for those who don't like Rust.

My C projects are mature and have been in production for a long time. They are mostly maintenance only, with new minor features added not so often, and only after careful consideration.


^Still^ ^interested^ ^in^ ^knowing^ ^what^ ^relevant^ ^projects^ ^will^ ^be^ ^using^ ^C23.^

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago

With hyper-threading and preemption in mind, maybe it's concurrency all the way down 😎 . But we should definitely keep this on the down low. Don't want the pesky masses getting a whiff of this.

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

🀣

I don't know, and I don't want to get personal. But that's usually a sign of someone who doesn't even code (at non-trivial levels at least)*, and thinks programming languages are like sport clubs, developers are like players contracted to play for one and only one club, and every person in the internet gantry need to, for some reason, pick one club (and one club only) to be a fanboy of. Some people even center their whole personality around such fanboyism, and maybe even venture into fanaticism.

So each X vs Y language discussion in the mind of such a person is a pre-game or a pre-season discussion, where the game or season is an imaginary competition such people fully concoct in their minds, a competition that X or Y will eventually and decidedly "win".

* Maybe that was an exaggeration on my part. Some junior developers probably fall into these traps too, although one might expect, or maybe hope, that their view wouldn't be that detached from reality.


I'm hoping to finally finish and send out a delayed new release for one of my older and mature CLI tools this weekend. It's written in C btw πŸ˜„

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I hope that someone in the 40 comments i don't have time to read right now has pointed out that the premise of OP is flawed for the simple reason that Rust hit v1.0 in 2015, while Zig is still nowhere near that milestone in 2024.

So we are not even talking about the same "future" period from the start.

So, no need to get to the second false premise in OP, which is limiting a "future" period to one successful dominating language only. Nor is there a need to go beyond these premises and discuss actual language details/features.

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

Bringing vimperator/pentadactyl back! That would be the dream.

Anyway, last time I tested it (~3 weeks ago), servo was not very usable still with the few websites I tried. Hopefully it gets, at least partway, there in a few months.

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you're not into tiling, install openbox and a panel of your choosing. You will quickly find that you don't need a DE at all.

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The maintenance is too high.

acquired knowledge spotted

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I will let you on a little secret.

The best "support" you can get is support from upstreams directly (I'm involved in both sides of that equation). But upstreams will often only "support" you when you 1. run the latest stable version 2. the upstream source code wasn't patched willy-nilly by the packager (your distro).

So the best desktop linux experience comes with using rolling distro that gives you such packages, with Arch being the most prominent example.

The acquired knowledge that argues stability and tells you otherwise is a meme.

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Never set foot in AU.
I was under the impression that Tasmania doesn't get that cold.
Also, apparently some would rather describe Perth as Mediterranean-SouthAfrican, rather than Mediterranean-Californian πŸ˜‰

view more: next β€Ί