Awa

joined 1 year ago
[–] Awa@mander.xyz 20 points 10 months ago

As a Floridian, I was disgusted to receive an email several month ago from the office of the Surgeon General advising against getting Covid vaccines and boosters knowing a majority of folks who receive this email will take this as best recommended practice. Folks, it is your choice, but please talk to your doctor to help guide you in such decisions.

[–] Awa@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

This is neat, however the problem that caused ischemic PAD in the first place (diabetes) will still be there and continue to do damage if not controlled.

[–] Awa@mander.xyz 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think it's more of an HCA for-profit thing. All my coworkers who have ever worked for HCA rarely had anything good to say about that company. Businesses that are for profit do not put patient care above all else. By trying to squeeze more profit out they cut staffing and quality equipment and increase mandatory overtime. In the end it's the staff and moreover the patients who suffer.

[–] Awa@mander.xyz 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

CHF in this case is the abbreviation for the Swiss franc (currency). I was quite confused initially reading it as CHF as the medical abbreviation for Congestive Heart Failure. Was wondering how heart failure and arthritis were related for a sec. :)

[–] Awa@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I am going to lock this post, though I would rather remove it. The information provided on the video and the video creator's website is not proof or evidence. The studies referred to are 8+ years old, which in the research community is considered outdated. Just because a site has .org does not mean it contains reliable information. Scientific evidence is more than stringing along several poorly correlating studies done by individual companies or persons. Also, what may work for some may not work for you and vice-versa. Everyone's biology, physiology, and other relevant backgrounds are different and should be taken into consideration when posting health-based information.

You are free to bring up topics to discuss here, but next time you post a video with a wall of text directly from the video summary, I will remove it. If you want to start out with a personal discussion and link information within your post to check out, I will consider allowing it as long as the intention is to create a constructive discussion, not merely being dismissive of alternative viewpoints.

Furthermore, I will update community rules as the action of posting links videos with no (or no original context to initiate a healthy dialogue between users) has become more prevalent. Please consider this a warning.

[–] Awa@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Care to add a TL:DW (too long: didn't watch) summary or any supporting discussion?

I watched it. Some good points, but very jargon-y and technical. Never heard of Bret Weinstein before.

IMO it would be better in the future to post something more than a link to a video we should watch. Will likely remove similar posts in the future with just video links without any other context or input from OP.

[–] Awa@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The information in the links you provided have no proof of scientific evidence or research studies to support them.

[–] Awa@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You bring up some excellent points.

After reading the article, I don't necessarily think it is biased to assuming STDs are more prevalent in the gay, bi, and trans community, just that that is the population this particular group of researchers have done the most studies on. I know that the gay, bi, and trans community in the past had much less healthcare studies for various reasons, so it is a good thing IMO that this population is not overlooked in studies and healthcare issues that impact all persons regardless of sex, sexual activity, or sexual identity.

I completely agree with limiting unnecessary prescriptions to help prevent "superbugs" along with secondary effects on the individuals taking the medications.

I never liked the idea of doctors just throwing pills at people. I have family members who run to their doc or a local clinic every time they get a cold to get a "z-pack" without just trying to deal with it allowing their non-compromised immune system do it's job. I believe part of the problem is lack of education (or incorrect information from online sites) and lack of knowledge of appropriate facilities to address conditions. The emergency room is for emergencies... not boo boos or something you can see your doctor or a doctor at a clinic for. Anyway, I have gone off on a tangent.

Thanks for your contribution in this discussion.

 

Up to 2 million people in the U.S. experience rapid-fire heartbeats from time to time, and many end up in the hospital for treatment.

But an investigational nasal spray may help folks with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) safely and quickly slow their heart rate on their own.

"Currently, PSVT is treated with intravenous medication administered in the emergency room or by paramedics when vagal maneuvers are not effective, which is the majority of cases," said study leader Dr. James Ip, an associate professor of clinical medicine at Weill Cornell Medical Center in New York City.

Vagal maneuvers are physical actions such as bearing down that make the vagus nerve slow your heart down.

Read More

At 160 to 250 heartbeats a minute, Ip said PSVT can be scary, but it isn't usually life-threatening.

When self-administered as a nasal spray, etripamil can slow heart rate in 30 minutes, according to a clinical trial funded by its maker, Milestone Pharma. Etripamil is a calcium channel blocker, a class of drugs known to slow down heart rates.

No medications are currently approved to treat PSVT without direct medical supervision, researchers said in background notes.

"This is a game changer because patients can now treat their own PSVT episode by themselves and avoid calling an ambulance or going to the emergency room," Ip said.

The study was published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Heart Association. Milestone Pharma plans to submit a new drug application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in October.

The new research is an extension of a previous trial of the nasal spray. Folks were 58 years old, on average, and had experienced 9.7 PSVT episodes in the previous year. Most were taking long-acting medications to prevent rapid heartbeats.

They wore an electrocardiogram (ECG) patch linked to a cellphone to transmit data about their symptoms. During PSVT episodes, they did a vagal maneuver, and self-administered the nasal spray if the rapid heartbeat continued. They kept the ECG patch on for five hours after the episode.

Of the 169 participants, 105 self-administered at least one dose of etripamil over seven months. Etripamil restored heart rate to normal within 30 minutes in 60% of 188 PSVT episodes, and within an hour in 75% of the episodes, the study showed.

Of 40 participants who self-treated two PSVT episodes, 63% responded to the medication within 30 minutes. What's more, people were good at detecting when they were experiencing these rapid heart rhythms, with 92 having one or more episodes confirmed by their ECG patch.

Ip said there were no serious heart-related adverse effects from the drug, and the most common side effects were nasal congestion or runny nose.

"The safety has been consistently demonstrated as a single dose, after a repeat dose after 10 minutes [if the first dose doesn't work], and after repeat dosing for multiple events," he said.

By contrast, oral medications take longer to work and may be associated with safety concerns such as fainting and low blood pressure, Ip said.

The drug is also being studied in people with a common heart rhythm disorder called atrial fibrillation (a-fib) and in children aged 6 to 17.

Outside experts agree that if approved, this nasal spray could be a game changer for the millions of people who experience rapid heartbeats.

"In the future, this could be a very effective and safe way for patients to treat themselves for this bothersome condition," said Dr. Deepak Bhatt, director of Mount Sinai Heart and professor of cardiovascular medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine in New York City.

Current treatment options for PSVT aren't always ideal, added Dr. Javier Banchs, director of electrophysiology and pacing at Baylor Scott & White Health in Dallas.

Catheter ablation uses a narrow plastic tube to kill cells responsible for the heart rhythm problems and is highly effective, but not everyone is a candidate or wants to undergo the procedure, he said.

Vagal maneuvers like straining, washing your face, drinking ice-cold water, or lying on your back with the legs elevated above the heart level don't always work either, Banchs said.

"A drug called adenosine, which can only be given through intravenous access, has been the pharmacological treatment of choice, but the success of a drug like etripamil in clinical trials has been long waited for," he said.

Dr. Adam Shapira , a cardiac electrophysiologist at Baylor Scott & White Health in Dallas, agreed.

"Having a safe, effective and self-administered pharmacological agent to terminate PSVT is a breakthrough," he said. "This agent will likely become the treatment of choice."

More information

The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more on paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT).

Copyright © 2023 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

[–] Awa@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I am a nurse and agree with your analysis of the article and information provided. Thank you for your input.

 

When doctors tell a patient “It’s all in your head,” that’s medical gaslighting. Here’s how to address an issue that disproportionately impacts the health of women, LGBTQ individuals and the elderly.

 

Hello all beings of the fediverse. I wanted to discuss something that may be hard for some but has recently come to my doorstep. My father-in-law has been fighting a terminal illness for quite some time. He's elderly and just recently took a turn for the worse physical and mentally. Prior to this he was still able to live independently, although unable to drive and had meals provided.

Since his recent decline and visit to the hospital, he is no longer able to make appropriate decisions and he can barely get around without full-time assistance. His appetite is greatly decreased as well as his fluid intake. He sleeps most of the day.

Prior to this, he had made his wishes known and decided that if he were to get to such a state, we would have hospice care. Well, that reality has come. I am thankful my husband and his sister are able to care for him throughout the day and we have nursing assistants coming over to help, especially as he declines and becomes unable to make it to the bathroom or even turn himself because he will become increasingly weak throughout the rest of his time.

Although I prefer my privacy, we have agreed to move him in with us, as I feel it is only fair for him to be cared for with dignity and be amongst loved ones.

I am a nurse by profession and have experienced many patients in their twilight. Many families want "everything" to be done for 90 year old Nana who is frail and fragile. I personally don't like doing CPR on any patient, but knowingly I will break Nana's ribs and if we do manage to get her back, chances are she will be on a breathing tube and likely have brain damage. She also will likely not be able to eat and will need additional tubes to provide nutrition as her muscles continue to atrophy. Hopefully there will be enough staff to keep her cleaned and turned as the boney areas get worn from friction, heat, moisture, lack of blood flow, and time creating bed sores. I have seen way too many of those. Once even so big you could fit your fist in each buttock cheek.

Getting back on track... Just curious how you envision caring for your loved ones when the time comes? What does your culture do in these times? How would you like your death to be?

Please stick to serious and thoughtful replies. This is a touchy subject for many but it is an inevitably for us all.

[–] Awa@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

About 3 years ago my husband and I stopped reheating anything in plastic containers. We still use them to store food in, but mainly have switched to glass containers.

We also invested in good water bottles that we use daily when in transit or at work.

We don't really use straws much but have been gifted reusable straws and occasionally use them, mostly for guests.

We recycle and have become more conscientious over the years in making greater attempts to avoid purchases that involve environmental contaminants.

[–] Awa@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, not everyone has an oven to heat things in, whereas microwaves can be easier and cheaper to come by. Not to mention the time convenience of using a microwave. But I agree it would be a healthier option.

[–] Awa@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

In the last few years we have switched from plastic to glass containers for this and similar health reasons.

 

In addition to the linked article, visit https://www.aad.org/public/diseases/skin-cancer/find/at-risk/abcdes to view the ABCDE method for assessing unusual skin growths.

 

To all those celebrating tonight, please be careful. Don't become a statistic.

 

Cross-posted from Beehaw.org. Interesting article.

view more: next ›