AntiBullyRanger

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago

Sure, but legally cannot be called a “run.”

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 3 points 1 week ago

I don't? I'm not Laura Jane Grace. I already answered the tyrannical hypothetical if you're asking: https://ani.social/post/9478577/8576050

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It wasn't a scandal per se, but that in attempting to replicate Groobo's runs, they found too many impossible situations to be plausible.

Groobo's “runs” can now be considered entertainment, no legitimacy to be found.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 6 points 1 week ago

They don't. It's the social media owner trying to exploit the person.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 17 points 1 week ago

Instead of protests at dealerships, they should be dismantling factories.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Both. But we already knew the point wasn't to ban free press, but ID people online like the Koreas.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

They already banned pornhub and pornographers. Fascists are going to fash.

MPA logo corrected