I own it but have only played a tiny bit of Vic3. Didn't they end up having to nerf communism because it ended up being the most effective policy by far?
Addfwyn
I am still extremely partial to Stellaris, though it is pretty different from the rest of their catalog given it is not a historical setting.
Everytime I tried to play HoI4, I just made whatever country I played communist. I assumed that is the victory condition right?
Since I left the city, I probably end up only drinking 3-4 times a year, so that's been an inadvertent benefit. I like to drink on occasion still, but I have a general policy of never drinking at home. Since I can't go out much here, it naturally limits itself.
Active goals, I have been trying to get my weight back to what I was when I was in university (around 48 kg). Technically it might be a little bit low for my height, but I always felt most comfortable at that weight. I definitely have gained some weight as I have gotten older though.
I also used to figure skate quite a lot when I was younger, I had a coach and did some light competition, but it was never super serious. Unfortunately that caps out in age pretty fast, so I am well past that these days.
I also did hapkido when I was younger, and I still do the hyungs on a regular basis. Probably that would just be considered a workout, but my main reason is just not to forget them.
A “senior China correspondent” that cites Radio Free Asia for anything can probably be safely ignored, especially given her history of articles.
He's too busy fighting on the front lines, didn't you see the green Warsuit to show how much war he is doing?
Going to wager he will not have an issue with the skipping bathing part though.
They had one a year ago, that was probably far more favorable than anything they will see now, until their minders shot it down.
This isn't even close to being a a legitimate peace proposal, at best it is an attempt to spin a "look, those mean Russians won't accept peace!" news story. There's nothing even resembling a concession, it reads more like a demand for unconditional surrender.
There’s obviously a chance for a big break through as the first defences are always the heaviest and it should get easier after that
That's the opposite of Russia's defensive doctrine, which would only be exacerbated further by the ability to deploy reserves where necessary. It could be a different story if Ukraine wasn't having to commit their exploitation forces just to try to reach the first lines of defense; even if they break through tomorrow they won't really have the manpower to do anything with it.
Nobody actually has any argument against this except ad hominems, which is usually fairly telling.
I have seen people trying to organise boycotts against Muslim owned businesses in retaliation for maybe not voting for Harris.
And they want us to believe they are totally the caring non-racist side.