97xBang

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 2 points 1 week ago

lol, I get that part, but how can they assess the presence of weapons if it's blurred.

[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 6 points 1 week ago

I believe ✌👽

[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 2 points 1 week ago

You are welcome

[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

El queso esta viejo y podrido 🦕

[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 6 points 1 week ago

And you don't want to accept it because that would mean disappointment again.

[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I'm being silly.

Isn't a counterexample just one datum? Even though its only one case, it's still science.

FTFM

[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

What's the point of scanning someone at that level of precision if they can't even see it? Seems pretty pointless to me.

[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Isn't a counterexample just da tomb? Even though its only won case-a-dilla, it's still le sahyênçe.

[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 7 points 1 week ago (10 children)

So TSA is practically seeing everyone naked? Is that for real?

[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You look for the person who will benefit...And, uh...You know, you'll, uh...You know what I mean.

[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 4 points 1 week ago

Harriet, I have spoken!

view more: ‹ prev next ›