2
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by edu4rdshl@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Will people here use/try Meta's #threads when available? Would love to know the reasons or if it would be just for fun/curiosity.

The amount of data collected is insane imo.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] simple@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Definitely not. I didn't come to the Fediverse to be under social media companies again.

[-] edu4rdshl@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Almost same take here - but I also understand that there may be some people which would use/try it for whatever reasons.

[-] Noxvento@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

They can try all day. I will not. Mastodon it is for me.

[-] cufta22@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

My brother in Christ, you're asking people on Lemmy if they're going to try meta spyware

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Never. Fuck Meta. Fuck Zuckerberg.

[-] ehrenschwan@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

The amount of data collected is so insane that it won't come out in the EU for now. And I like it that way.

[-] Kaldo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It doesn't have to come to EU to get this data though, all it has to do is start federating. I'm really curious how is that all going to work out, legally speaking.

[-] C_M@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Not totally true, the real value is combining data from different sources, but since the data they get wont have your email /ip/device/contacts etc it will be a lot harder to harvest usefully for advertising. Maybe they will figure out things to use it, but what they can use is already quite public, so they don't really need to federatie for that

[-] edu4rdshl@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Now these are news for me, thanks for the info.

[-] Clbull@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Privacy-wise, I already use Facebook, WhatsApp, Messenger and Instagram, and I'm pretty sure that Mark Zuckerberg knows everything that he'd ever want to know about me. I largely believe in the conspiracy theory that Meta actively listens in on users in some way to serve them ads and targeted content, even if the evidence is circumstantial at best.

Despite this, would I still use Threads? Probably not.

Microblogging isn't my thing. 140 characters is nowhere near enough space to articulate your thoughts and it feels like the site was originally designed around SMS text message limitations more than anything. I also don't like how the only way you can get any genuine interaction on places like Twitter or even Mastodon is to be a celebrity.

I do agree that we should collectively defederate Threads much in the same way that everybody on the fediverse collectively blacklisted Gab, not necessarily as a fuck-you to Zuckerberg, but because a flood of Instagram normies would completely cripple other instances with traffic.

[-] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I stay the fuck away from anything Meta/Facebook, so absolutely not.

[-] win95@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

We need to let meta die slowly, so no.

[-] SojournerWeaver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I was curious how it compared to Mastodon. It didn't.

[-] aquarisces@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Nah, fuck that and fuck them

[-] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not until they add some basic features and we get some answers on the data collection.

It doesn't even offer a reverse chronological list of posts with only people you follow. That is basic, day 1 level functionality for me.

I don't think I'll use it in any serious way. I left Facebook years ago now. I have an Instagram but never use it. I'm just not a user of Meta's products. But I'll reserve my handle and if Twitter itself finally craps the bed at least I'll have one more off ramp.

[-] dbilitated@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago

no definitely not installing it or opening an account.

I'm not against federation tho, I'd be in favour of showing people you can get all the same content through another channel. defederating means that people will have to use it if there's content from someone they like on there. I don't want to give people a reason to install that shit.

[-] VirtualAlias@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

I'll try it. I don't really care about data privacy very much and neither do a lot of other people until the data receiver is someone they dislike.

How much data is Reddit, Tumblr, Uber, Snapchat, WhatsApp, AirBnB or any other app getting? Who cares as long as I don't hate their CEO.

[-] _cerpin_taxt_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

This is a pretty moronic take. "All of these other companies have already stolen my privacy, so what's one more? It's not like this specific company has helped undermine democracy in a world superpower the last two elections!"

[-] VirtualAlias@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

There it is. It's not about the data - it's political.

[-] _cerpin_taxt_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

One has a lot to do with the other lmao. Yeah, I don't like any companies that undermine democratic elections. Do you?

[-] envious92@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I think it's exciting. I don't hate Twitter, but a competitor with big money back in that's potentially going to integrate with the fediverse? That's fucking exciting.

Will they actively contribute or fork it? Who knows.

[-] ErgodicTangle@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

They will actively contribute while growing their userbase. When they hit critical mass they will cutoff the fediverse and take their users and their content with them. It happened before.

[-] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Not touching that, nope.

[-] animist@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago
[-] Arotrios@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Thanks to @m0bi13 who posted this breakdown for context :

Data collected by #threads:

  • Health & Fitness
    
    
  • Financial info
    
    
  • Contact info
    
    
  • User content
    
    
  • Browsing History
    
    
  • Usage Data
    
    
  • Diagnostics
    
    
  • Purchases
    
    
  • Location
    
    
  • Contacts
    
    
  • Search history
    
    
  • Identifiers
    
    
  • Sensitive Info
    
    
  • Other Data
    
    

Oh fuck no. The very first line is basically a HIPAA violation. It gets worse from there. We require less disclosure from Supreme Court Justices and Presidential nominees.

This is a trainwreck waiting to happen - even if Facebook itself doesn't abuse this level of power, you know that bad actors within the organization will. And once the information is collected, you know that tyrannical governments all over the world will be falling over themselves to get access to the data. This is a stalker's wetdream, an Orwellian orgasm of truly grotesque proportions.

Keep the Fediverse from Zucking. Just say no to Threads.

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
2 points (62.5% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
3872 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS