70
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mysoulishome@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Only needed one sentence there to know all I need to. “Currently there is no way to only see people you follow.” Lol so more bullshit like Facebook and Instagram where you get friend, Ad, sponsored post, you might like this, group post, friend, Ad, Ad…

Just another way for Facebook to feed you non stop adverting in between tiny bites of content. We talk about how terrible Reddit is…I don’t understand how my wife uses Facebook at all.

I feel bad for people who will get sucked into this nonsense and enjoy the fediverse through an app that is basically malware come to life.

[-] Jmr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

As far as I'm aware. No big youtuber has mentioned the fediverse in their posts or videos about threads. It's either they don't know or don't care. Unfortunately we might need to battle threads alone

[-] duckef@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Gen z and lower don't use the internet like millennials and above. My cousins and sister are all under 20 and use group chats, dischord, Snapchat and tiktok because they want connections with their groups of friends not strangers online.

[-] mysoulishome@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

My daughter is 15 and you’re exactly right. Demographic wise…who do guy think the target audience for threads is and how is meta going to stay in business if Gen Z uses NONE of their apps?

[-] APurplPanther@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I think it's like that now cause they rushed release, given Twitter's recent issues.

As of now, there are no ads. The main feed is essentially a jumbled mess of your followers and random popular posts. They say they don't plan to monetize until it's more fleshed out, so we'll see how long that takes.

[-] Marxine@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It'll happen when they capture the biggest portion of Twitter's users. As soon as that happen enshittification shall descend upon it.

[-] xaxl@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think if somebody wants that kind of content they are well served already by Reddit, Facebook etc.

Please don't go to Lemmy and try to turn it into that.

[-] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

This is overly pessimistic IMO.

Yes, it’s full of brands and influencers posting inane things. It’s also only been open for what a day or two? It’s new and the first big name replacement for Twitter that has momentum.

Remember back when Twitter was new? When everyone cool was saying it was full of inane influencers and randoms posting about their lunch or stupid observations? It took years to be as big as it is (which isn’t that big to be fair) and so useful for things like news, politics, communities, etc.

The internet has speed up since Twitter came out so I think we’ll see what Threads ends up being by the end of the year. So far it has insane hype behind it, something no other Twitter like service since has had. Let’s see if that becomes something more.

[-] Vaggumon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I mean it's Facebook, why would anyone expect anything but diarrhea from a laxative loaded sandwich?

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

advertisement for new pants pops in to your feed

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

The desire to gag upon reading that description mirrors my sentiments toward the company.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] astral_avocado@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 year ago

Seems pretty hyperbolic. I joined through my insta out of curiosity and I saw like half my friends posting stuff already, saying hi or an update about their life. And all the meme accounts I follow were already posting shit ofc. I'm sure a significant fraction of Lemmy's interactions are based around meme posts, so we're doing the same thing they are. That's just how humans like existing on the internet.

For the record I'm anti Facebook, but you can't get around the fact that almost all your friends and everyone you see walking around likely has an Instagram account. It's just a given and I feel like people here hate acknowledging that.

[-] volkhavaar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I believe that threads is currently limiting advertising while they draw users in (before the expected bait and switch after they’ve captured the audience).

See “enshittification”

https://doctorow.medium.com/tiktoks-enshittification-bb3f5df91979

[-] owsei@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While it is hyperbolic if you only consider posts that are not immediate, that's not the main part od the article.

the point of following ppl on Twitter, for the author, is sharing and reading thoughts about very precise moments, like a comeback in a debate, or a team scoring in a game

[-] frozengriever@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Such angst and yet no mention of Mastodon as a FOSS alternative.

[-] Salvo@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Mastodon (and other FOSS ActivityPub platforms) aren’t just great because they are open source, they are great because they are distributed.

The Internet was designed to be resilient, famously designed to withstand (a nuclear) attack. The World Wide Web started to make it monolithic and Web 2.0 resulted in a more centrally controlled infrastructure.

When an attack comes from above (like Musk, /u/spez, Meta and Google) one (group of) individual(s) can take our whole swathes of content in one policy change.

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It feels so manufactured and fake.

Like LinkedIn

[-] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I'm so happy I don't have any desire to see it.

The joy of missing out!

[-] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly, the article made me morbidly curious, like passing by a particularly awful car crash.

[-] TacoNot@vlemmy.net 9 points 1 year ago

Have you ever been high/drunk and you walk into a CVS and the security guard is staring at you? That’s what Threads is.

This part makes me want to read more from this author.

[-] speck@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

They had me with

"Threads feels like when a local restaurant you enjoy opens a location in an airport.

It feels like a Twitter alternative you would order from Brookstone."

Perfectly captures the banal uncanny valley of it all

[-] dep@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Threads is the Good Morning America of social media.

[-] ScOULaris@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Haha, wow. This is a perfect metaphor. Well done.

[-] wagesj45@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Those screenshots are unreal. Did real people write those? Unironically? Screenshots from Threads is going to do for cringe what Twitter screenshots did for humor.

[-] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I got the same reaction. I guess now we know why the company is called Meta.

[-] Ignacio@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

It is an app stuffed with verified users I’ve never heard of who have 7 million YouTube subscribers. They all do Epic Pranks and they spread Positive Vibes and they Don’t Talk Politics Here.

What a shit show. No wonder why depression disorders are skyrocketing.

[-] jimmyjazx@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

I enjoyed the authors metaphors

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They certainly painted a picture, lol

[-] 8ender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Spot on with Twitter having Berlin 1937 vibes

[-] xxwarlorddarkdoomxx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It reminded me of Regular Car Reviews, if you’ve ever seen that.

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean I'm too old to "get it" too, but this blog post just reads like an old man yelling at kids to get off their lawn lol

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Me before reading this article: "I'm never going to install or use Threads, and I'm not remotely interested in it."

Me after reading this article: "Ok, now it has my attention, but only in the same way that seeing a multi-vehicle pileup in an ice storm does: You can't help but wonder how many more cars are going to plow into it."

[-] animist@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago
[-] Fester@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

“You have any games on your phone?”

“Just kidding, I know exactly what’s on your phone.”

[-] fidodo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Twitter thrived with its own micro-celebrities, many of whom were anonymous Socialists with the word “boner” in their handles. It’s not clear if they’re coming to a Mark Zuckerberg-owned social network.

Twitter’s best service was instant takes on breaking news. Are bland, micromanaged Instagram celebs suddenly going to have something interesting to say during a presidential debate?

That pretty much sums up why I never used Twitter. That sounds horrible.

[-] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Is there something else of value that you think micro-blogging can provide that causes people to login to it on a daily basis?

The entire point of micro-blogging is essentially "this is my opinion on x" shouted into the algorithm where the algorithm then picks up what is popular among the userbase. Invariably the only thing that provides something constant and new to talk about every single day is breaking news.

[-] fidodo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I think it's a horrible form factor for expressing your opinion. The text limit inherently causes reductivism and "hot takes" which lack nuance and spread misinformation. I think it's a shitty form factor for serious topics. If it's something relatively harmless like jokes and memes then I don't think it's too harmful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] trouser_mouse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] niktemadur@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Madlads material right here.

[-] moosh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That article was a fun read. Now I won’t be trying threads but I wasn’t going to before too.

[-] muaveri@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What metatrap does the best, trial and error & if it fails they'll throw some Gs on somebody who succeeded

[-] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah I don't think any big social media company has ever successfully launched a new website, only bought startups.

[-] Tyson712@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Because no lifers have taken it over already. Trolls, influencers and everything in between was always going to be the first to adopt it because they have the time to do it. Just cut all that crap out of your life, you don't need it

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
70 points (87.2% liked)

Technology

58135 readers
4540 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS