this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
210 points (90.4% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
3102 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago (1 children)

tik tok has a lot of ads.

This is the entire news story.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For me, this is the real news:

a shocking number of ads, rivaling network TV.

Everyone being so shocked at Tiktok ads while they have been watching as many or even more ads via their daily TV sessions.. for decades, and no one bats an eye at that?

[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wtf are you talking about? Arguably the rise of streaming and TV recording is purely due to the disgusting amounts of advertising on TV. Streamers start adding ads to their paid services and everyone goes "this is why we stopped watching live TV, are you stupid, Netflix?" Nobody bats an eye at TV ads? I literally haven't watched live TV for over a decade. What planet have you been living on?

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I said that no one seems to be shocked by the amount of ads on tv, while they are so shocked by the same amount on tiktok. Which I think is rather peculiar (or hypocritical). If that was not clear, then please accept my apologies.

[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yes that's what I thought you said. I asked wtf you were talking about because what you were saying is so incorrect that it is like you intentionally chose the opposite of the truth, sorry if that wasn't clear.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"shocking"?

What did they expect?

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Its business insider. They probably drank their own koolaid and assumed capitalism altruistically served up top tier content. The only other alternative piece would be justifying the deluge of ads as necessary and unavoidable to ensure the continued operation of tiktok

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So don't use it? I don't understand why people complain and then don't do anything as a result of their complaint.

Stop using the crappy platform. If you want video hosting there are literally way better options and that predate tiktok

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Seems like people are going off the headline only, so here are some more details. While the results are predictable, it's still worth exploring for how bad it is

The results? On TikTok, about a third of the content we watched were ads — but it didn't always feel that way.

TikTok didn't respond to a request for data on how frequently ads supposed are to on the bak site and how these ads are dispersed on the For You Page (FYP). However, a TikTok spokesperson told Insider ads supposed are to represent a small portion of the content people should see on their FYP.

Hannah's observations

Sebastian's observations

[–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

yeah agreed with your sentiment. I think it’s good to have an intuition about something, but it’s much better when there’s data to back it up.

Cuz then, they can do the same with others, say Youtube or other streaming services, and start to compare the numbers, like % of ads, what types of ads, how long are the ads relative to content, how many of these ads are political, how many of these ads may be harmful, …

Having these numbers can be quite handy for other researchers and regulators to look into these issues more concretely, rather than just say, “as your brothers and sisters already know, tiktok serves ads”

[–] F_Haxhausen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Not much different than Facebook, instagram, tumblr. About every forty post was an advertisement. It’s why I left those.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

We're you expecting a different outcome?

[–] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 year ago

The only place were the ads are better content than the content

[–] heygooberman@lemmy.today 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One thousand TikToks? How do you retain your sanity from watching that many?

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

muting the shitty music reduces harmful effects by 54.6%

[–] Hillock@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's only 3-4 hours. I think most of us would be fine doing that for our job. I certainly would watch 3-4 hours of TikTok and write down some statistics for getting paid.

[–] DrCatface@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

30mins in my eyes would start bleeding

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

You deserve worse for watching that many tik toks.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

We watched 1,000 TikToks in one sitting.

"Doctor, when I bash my head against a brick wall, it hurts!"

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 7 points 1 year ago

Do you not have anything better to do with your time?

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

LOL, whay any sane human would do that?

[–] beefpeach@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

This is how you get brain rot and die.