this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
281 points (94.0% liked)

World News

32289 readers
930 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't "support" gaza but I sure as fuck condemn israel.

You don't have to pick sides people.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

You're against genocide? That sounds antisemitic.

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.”

-Dante Alighieri

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not maintaining neutrality. I'm on the side that will condemn both Israel and Hamas for their shitty behavior. Don't do terrorism, don't do genocide.

You and I both know that neither side is acting ethically nor morally. My government's (and probably your's) aligment with Israel is about power, politics, and economics, not ethics.

[–] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

not maintaining neutrality

condemn both

Only one side has committee genocide and terrorism for the past 80ish years. Wanna know who it is?

People like you:

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.

  • George W. Bush
[–] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you are neutral then you are in a position to help the injured and unfortunate on both side of the conflict.

-Ivan the Terrible

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago

I'm playing both sides so that I always come out on top

  • Ronald 'Mac' McDonald
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Condemn Israel is picking side that's against genocide lol

[–] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don’t have to pick sides people.

Ooh boy, another enlightened centrist. Makes vague states about everything and holds no strong positions on anything

[–] throwaway@monero.town 26 points 1 year ago

I was there. The organisers think it's more like 500k people. There is going to be an even bigger demo on the 11th of November, try to make it if you can.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Tens of thousands marched through central London yesterday to demand a ceasefire in Gaza with many also expressing fury at the UK government’s refusal to back one.

As Israel ratcheted up its offensive in the coastal strip 2,200 miles away, around 100,000 people attended the latest demonstration – matching last Saturday’s record turnout for a pro-Palestinian march in the UK.

One difference seemed to be a palpably more tense mood than previous marches, reflecting events unfolding in Gaza and widespread exasperation over the government’s approach to the three-week-old conflict.

(tldr: 3 sentences skipped)

His wife, Nadia, also 56, was preoccupied with a topic that had seemingly angered many on the march: the decision of the UK to abstain on voting for Friday’s UN resolution urging an immediate “humanitarian truce” in Gaza.

(tldr: 3 sentences skipped)

Among the vast crowd, holding aloft a large Palestinian flag, Londoner Saad Mia, 47, maintained hope that another high turnout could influence the government.

(tldr: 12 sentences skipped)

The home secretary, Suella Braverman, has urged police chiefs to consider interpreting the chant as an “expression of a violent desire to see Israel erased from the world”.

(tldr: 5 sentences skipped)


The original article contains 597 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!