this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
56 points (98.3% liked)

Formula 1

9059 readers
29 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 21-23 Nov
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vos@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I mean there are fewer missile strikes in Spa so he’s got a point

[–] ArtVandelay12@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. Spa is dangerous in the rain but there have been attempts to make it safer over the years but it's still an old school style track. Jeddah is a new track that could be argued was designed to be dangerous; it's very fast with little run off and a lot of blind corners.

[–] mattym00cow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jeddah is unnerving to watch. If I remember, drivers often report it being one of the most stressful and tiring races because of the requirements to be attentive.

[–] ibra_him@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I recall Norris talking about it after the first race, but they did improve it and for the last GP.

[–] anji@lemmy.anji.nl 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Max is probably right but that doesn't make Spa (my favorite track!) "safe". Two deaths in 4 years is very unusual for modern motor racing. Something needs to be done with Raidillon, like automatic instant yellow flags whenever a car leaves the track.

Or maybe a speed limit through Raidillon in the rain makes sense.

[–] TrekHuis@feddit.nl 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spa is an older track, with a lot of change already to it. I’m all for safety but more damage to the environment is not something the government will allow, so if they push for a safer Spa, then there will be no Spa.

I think in this case they could have stopped the race, because every track would have been dangerous in this conditions.

[–] makeitra1n@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I mean he is right. Spa is only dangerous when raining and the visibility is poor.

[–] Mannivu@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago

Spa was great when the cars had less downforce and had to slow down at the Radillion. Now they can do it flat out and it's too dangerous.