this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43821 readers
897 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The federated concept is nice. But I feel like what will happen in the end is that most of the content will end up on few instances. This still gives power to the owners of these instances, and if they delete the instance a lot of people would lose accounts?

What would be your ideas to improve this and have less centralization?

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Sergigig@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Make it possible to migrate from one instance to another, with all of your account history.

[โ€“] rist097@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good idea. Possibly be able to download locally a database od your account and upload it to another instance

[โ€“] Astrovenator@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Mastodon let's you do exactly this, I think lemme should too

[โ€“] Ghast@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

People who want near-perfect distribution of power often talk about the serverless model. It's sounds like it might work for something like e-mail, but I don't see how it's possible for something like Lemmy. This comment it cached on every instance with one person who follows it.

Atm, keeping Lemmy going for a couple of days might require 50 Gigabytes and lots of bandwidth. If you put that on a mobile phone, it'll be a 50 Gig app, which will drain all your data in minutes.

But I think chatboards work well with servers, so it doesn't seem like a problem.

[โ€“] MoreIronOre@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have a cap on how many members an instance can have, perhaps.

[โ€“] rist097@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That could help. But people might just keep spamming new instances

[โ€“] MoreIronOre@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Most likely, but that is a different problem lmao.

[โ€“] ThatGuy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Content is basically avaliable to everyone regardless of what you end up choosing. At worst, they can block an instance from interacting with another.

Most problems can just be solved by moving to a new instance that meets your needs. Or if you really must, make your own with your own rules.

My concern is an instance shutting down and losing access to all that information. I can always make a new account, but losing all that info from the entire instance could be a big problem. Maybe by then tho people will archive them somehow.

The most extreme case I can think of would be instances blocking everyone but themselves or a few select instances, and forcing everyone within them to follow their rules to access it. But I feel like that would be hard to pull off, people would just jump ship way before it gets to that point.

[โ€“] MoreIronOre@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I will see how Lemmy develops, but if I do stick around, I think I will host my own private 1-person instance.