this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40199 readers
1459 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When I'm working and have a question, I usually ask the ones I know to be knowledgeable and with ample job experience for advice, because they're the most qualified to give me the best advice.

Sometimes, when I do this, an extrovert who needs to talk will try to answer at the same time the person I asked is answering, meaning I get 2 very similar answers on stereo if that makes sense, but I cannot concentrate on any of the 2 stereo answers.

Sometimes this happens with 3 coworkers: the knowledgeable one I asked the question to and 2 extroverts answering at the same time the person I asked answers.

I hate it when this happens. I'm clearly talking to ONE person, looking at him in the eye. Why do other people feel I'm talking to them, even though I am not making eye contact with them?

I mean, can you guys listen to 2 people answering a question simultaneously and get both answers right?

I've started telling them I cannot hear the answer if they speak at the same time and sometimes I have to tell them I'm not talking to them, but to a specific coworker. So far, they're backing off, but why are (some?) extroverts like this?

To me, the best way to learn something if I'm not reading a book or manual is with one on one conversations: I ask a question, knowledgeable person gives an answer, I write down what I know I'm gonna have to remember and move on. Is this something only introverts do?

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago

Say your expert's name is Kayla. Start by just saying "Kayla". Pause about half a second until she makes full eye contact, until she acknowledges you. Then ask your question. By doing this, it focuses the conversation on you and Kayla. If Paul interupts you can politely say "hold on Paul, I want to hear what Kayla has to say". It's not impolite because you "set up the rules" for the question when you started.

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 31 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

This isn't an extrovert behaviour, it's a rude behaviour. They aren't linked.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, depends on the situation. Personally, I wouldn't call it rude when someone kind of free-fire responds to a question they hear. In that case, best course of action is to just chuckle at them responding synchronously and ask for only one of them to speak at a time.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Right, but if they keep talking while the other person is trying to talk, that's rude.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

Oh yeah, that for sure.

[–] Avg@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's called adhd and I have impulse control issues.

[–] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago

The impulse to start talking or interrupting people you can pin to ADHD no problem - but tunnel firing for a whole dialogue discussing a problem?

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 30 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No, extroverts and ambiverts have trouble with interrupters too.

In a work environment, I find it best just to say I'm having trouble keeping up, and could first person please continue. Most of the time, it's gonna work fine

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 16 hours ago

Excellent approach, putting that in my book of tools.

I'd also be sure to ask the second person to finish what they were trying to say after person 1 was done.

There are 2 reasons:

  1. Never know if they have a different perspective or other ideas. They may also have thought of something while listening.

  2. In the help desk world you learn these kinds of people get worse when they get shut down. If you actively engage them (even if you don't really want to), they'll feel heard, and maybe be less likely to feel compelled to interrupt. Plus you come across as a Good Guy® at work.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 2 points 12 hours ago

Helpful to say the person's name before you ask. "Sarah, what's the resistivity of tungsten?" Then the others will tune out before they even hear the question.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 22 hours ago

Sounds like you have rude colleagues.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I usually hold up one finger and say, "Bup bup bup! I didn't ask you. Did I?"

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Followed by putting duct tape over their mouths!

.....and some clothespins on their nipples......

What? I'm kinky.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Schedule a meeting in a conference room with the one you want to talk to. Just you and the other person.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

rude people who talk over others just need to be ignored. if they continue, put them in their place with a look, a raised eyebrow, roll the eyes and then go back to the person you were actually addressing. it's childish and should be pointed out if it continues.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I've heard before that it can be more difficult for folks on the autism spectrum, because we perceive more of the details in each voice, so it's more likely to overwhelm us.

But it certainly doesn't have to be. Neuroboring folks also don't find it helpful when two speak at the same time.

[–] Avg@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago

Opposite of neurospicy. 🙃