this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
90 points (95.9% liked)

Fediverse

32074 readers
762 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I absolutely love wiki walking through random obscure fan wikis, but I hate how most are on Fandom.

I think a federated wiki solution makes sense. I could see it as an evolution of the interwiki concept.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 12 hours ago (5 children)
[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like there is a federated solution for everything lol

There's also a list of ActivityPub software on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub#Software_using_ActivityPub

[–] lgsp@feddit.it 2 points 3 hours ago

Nah... Missing IMHO:

  • Strava like
  • IMDB like
  • stackoverflow like
  • google maps review like
[–] nutomic@lemmy.ml 35 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Thanks for linking my project. Im happy to answer questions about it. Also here you can find the git repo.

[–] early_riser@lemmy.radio 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This looks interesting.

Seems like it's still early days yet, but are there plans to add things like namespaces and categories?

[–] nutomic@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 hours ago

For now my focus is to make it federate with Lemmy and the rest of the Fediverse. But you're welcome to open an issue for that kind of feature.

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This looks very awesome. So it also functions as a redundant wiki?

Wikipedia should use it. Then others can create their own wikis, which keep a version of articles of Wikipedia.

[–] nutomic@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Its similar to Lemmy in many ways, so like Lemmy posts are redundantly mirrored across instances, the same is true for Ibis articles.

Getting Wikipedia federated would be great, but it will take a long time for Ibis to be ready for that scale.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

Can ibis import a full Wikipedia backup?

[–] MxRemy@piefed.social 8 points 11 hours ago

It wouod be amazing to see Ibis take off and pick up more developers

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 hours ago

This is the answer.

[–] caos@feddit.org 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Hubzilla (macroblogging service in the Fediverse) can also be used to create and collaborate on wikis.

I can only find a German-language manual for this right away: https://help.hubzilla.hu/benutzerhandbuch/wikis.html

[–] jabeez@lemmy.today 3 points 7 hours ago

Hubzilla is pretty amazing and has a ton of potential, unfortunately hasn't really taken off at all.

[–] PastelKeystone@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago
[–] Binzy_Boi@feddit.online 7 points 10 hours ago

It's not federated by any means, but if you want to replace FANDOM wikis with other equivalents, Indie Wiki Buddy is a great extension to have on hand.

https://getindie.wiki/

There's options to remove FANDOM from search results in favour of other options, and they also allow you to redirect to the Breezewiki frontend for FANDOM to get rid of all those shitty ads and UI, which is legal considering the contents of FANDOM pages are still under the Commons.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I've had this thought before, but have also wondered whether it's even possible to implement this using ActivityPub, considering that a wiki inherently requires having the same state everywhere, but ActivityPub allows instances to ban and defederate how they like (thus become desynchronized from each other).

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 12 hours ago

I see, thanks. Will look into that.

[–] early_riser@lemmy.radio 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not thinking of a single distributed wiki, but something more like Fandom where you can edit pages on other wikis that are federated to yours.

[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound like a federated wiki but more like federated account management.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, people tend to mistake "federated" for "open alternative" 🤷

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Sounds like single sign-on (SSO). Which is practically everywhere these days.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago

I mean most fandom I have seen have more than one wiki as there is more than one wiki company.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, that could definitely be cool.

Cost would be a big factor ... Fandom got big by being free and eventually replaced (or heavily customized) mediawiki to the point it's unrecognizable.

[–] sonalder@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Hosting a wiki isn't that expensive it's basically texts and some lightweight pictures. The whole english wikipedia is around 109GB of data.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

That doesn’t include images. Images are stored on wikimedia commons, which is about 600 TB.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

It's not federated, but something like BookStack could be an option for self-hosted collaboration.

[–] early_riser@lemmy.radio 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Easy hosting isn't quite the issue. Dokuwiki is trivial to self host. What I'd like something that's a happy medium between requiring account creation to edit pages and letting literally every rando with an IP address go to town.

[–] GroupNebula563@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if it could be done with a MediaWiki plugin, given how extensible MW and its plugin system is

[–] early_riser@lemmy.radio 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't doubt it, though MW seems hard to manage.

[–] GroupNebula563@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

It's not that bad once you get the hang of it, especially using a wiki farm like http://www.miraheze.org/

[–] sonalder@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

Or maybe Miraheze but it doesn't sem federated either

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 11 hours ago

This is another example of the type of thing it would be great for conventions and clubs and such to host.