Don't make me laugh, it's not socialism! it's bro-ism, 'cause, I got you bro. If everyone got their bros and we all bros then we can do absolutely anything bro!

[–] blade_barrier@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Unfortunately, socialism discourages and eventually kills off broism.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

I like to swap out "ism" with "frame". In this case broism becomes broframe.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 27 points 13 hours ago (7 children)

Socialism in america only exists for corporations. "Hey bankers! Screwed up again? Here's more money to play with."

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I appreciate the sentiment, but the public sector supporting the private is not "socialism." Socialism describes an economic formation where public ownership is primary in an economy, ie where large firms are publicly owned and controlled. Segments of an economy cannot be Socialist or Capitalist just like an arm cannot be a human, it can only exist in the context of the whole.

Socialism, in reality, refers to a broader economy where public ownership is primary, while Capitalism refers to a broader economy where private ownership is primary. All Socialist societies have had public and private Capital, and all Capitalist societies have had public and private Capital, it matters most which one has the power.

I recommend reading my post here on common problems people run into when determining Modes of Production.

[–] eurisko@lemmy.ca 5 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Original commenter: jokes in class solidarity

Response: « I appreciate the attempt, but what you said was wrong on sooooo many levels, in this essay, I will... »

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 12 points 13 hours ago

She's got a work on her sales pitch. "Probably one of the greatest... Oh it's not for you, it's more of a Shelbyville idea..."

load more comments