this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
53 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

46439 readers
818 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grid11@lemy.nl 4 points 1 hour ago

Because most people haven't gone far enough to even understand this question. The choices come prepackaged, that's what in front of their eyes, so they assume that's how it suppose to be, and take the easy ride

[–] tfm@europe.pub 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Because of network effects.

Building a social network is hard. A typical chicken or egg problem. If you don't have a user base, nobody is willing to join, and if nobody joins, you don't have a user base.

It usually requires a bunch of money to build a social network.

The fediverse has a long time to go but I believe it will win sooner or later.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'd also chalk it up to convenience.

The Fediverse requires effort.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 3 points 2 hours ago
[–] bambootstrap@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The Fediverse is a confusing concept. I’m a giant nerd and even I don’t really understand how this is supposed to work. Centralized platforms provide a more straightforward user experience. And as others have said, that’s where the content is right now.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 hours ago

It's no more confusing than using email, and everybody managed to figure that out. You don't need to know how the nitty gritty of it works. The network effects is a far bigger issue, as you point out, centralized platforms simply have far more content on them.

[–] MiniMoose4Free@lemm.ee 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Because I have no clue what the Fediverse is.

[–] SendPrudes@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

Yeah and I wasn’t sure what it mean on account creation to commit to a server fully. I ended up getting a lot of supportive comments when I did ask.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

Evolution of human behaviour is slow. Right now we are all enmeshed in the dawning discovery that the current way we run society is falling apart at the seams. Just enter the core of almost any city in North America and you'll see what I mean (and not just N. America). It'll take a while to set itself right, or it may all just burn in a raging nuclear fire launched by a pissed off oligarch who does not get his way.

Definitely not forward progress towards a better day.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 4 hours ago

Because they want to feel involved. They want to be with the in-crowd. If they come to the Fediverse, then they'll think it's weird and might scare them because it's a new concept they can't grasp. When really, I see the Fediverse as just a social media reset. But because it doesn't have all of the enshittification that centralized social media has, they don't dare bother.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

There are going to be layers to this.

  1. There are lots of people who are just downright too stupid. They wouldn't be on the internet at all if Tim Apple didn't put it in a baby baba for them to suck it out of. They use Facebook because their iPhone came with the Facebook app pre-installed.

  2. There are lots of people for whom popularity is the only thing that exists. Their brain cannot function beyond "Everyone uses Twitter." They'll adopt this platform only after everyone else in the world does.

  3. There are lots of people who have bought the propaganda. The dark web is for drug traffickers and hitmen, torrenting is for pirates, end-to-end encryption is for traitors, and Mastodon is for Linux neckbeards. You shouldn't associate with those people.

  4. There's this weird trend where the commercial platforms are becoming hives for conservatives, so they're probably going to stay put in their echo chambers. I have observed little to no presence of actual conservatives on this platform; beyond the horseshoe effect with the tankie crowd.

  5. The culture of content consumption is not supported by the Fediverse. We don't do algorithmic slop troughs here, and the amount of content on Peertube and Loops rounds down to zero, so it doesn't fulfill the role of mesmerizing colors and sounds for staring at and drooling like Tiktok does or linear television did.

  6. Open source software is usually a bit shit. Be it lack of budget, opinionated developers, redundant projects...we can never have one of something. Why does Lemmy, Mbin and Piefed exist simultaneously? We always end up with software that mostly works, has a lot less graphical polish, a shitty project name, a few missing key features and a couple workarounds you just have to know about. Or an intentionally godawful UI. That'll put people off.

  7. A few people who show up are going to be put off by the weirdest decision they'll be asked to make this month: "Choose an instance, your choice doesn't matter, just pick one." If it doesn't matter, why make me pick? I bet if you watched 100 people try to sign up for a Fediverse platform, at least 30 of them will balk at that stage. I've sat and stared at that for awhile myself and I'm one of the ones who made it through.

  8. They just haven't heard of us. Ask ten people you know in real life if they've heard of Lemmy, or Mastodon, or Pixelfed. I bet they haven't, or if they have they let it pass in one ear and out the other out of apathy.

  9. A few people have looked at the Fediverse, didn't see what they wanted here, and left. If you play Satisfactory, for example, you'll find an active subreddit where the majority of the player base and the developers of the game interact, on Lemmy you'll find one community where exactly one person posts "daily screenshots until I get bored." It's easy to wander off, especially if you don't like left wing politics, Linux and the Fediverse itself.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

“Choose an instance, your choice doesn’t matter, just pick one.” If it doesn’t matter, why make me pick?

Email requires you to pick a provider, but it doesn't matter.

I think when people falk about #7, it needs to be revised to "your choice of instance doesn't matter when you're a noob. By the time it does matter, you'll understand what you want from an instance and can simply make another account"

Agree on all other points though. I hope Lemmy keeps growing and getting more active. A lot of the communities I've joined only have a few posts in the past year.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

As always, there's multiple reasons for things. You did a great job breaking down as much as possible :) the other comments are all right, but you are comprehensive :)

[–] meaansel@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I asked someone on bluesky i follow what is mastodon lacking that they ultimately chose bluesky, and they said something along the lines "basic ease of use. The way it works is probably perfectly sensible to fediverse people, but I had an awful time there"

They do indeed have (abandoned) mastodon account with posts, so they did try. I don't know what they meant by it lacking basic ease of use, and I didn't feel entitled to ask stranger for more explanation. But it wasn't picking instance, since they already had an account on one of them.

The only thing I personally noticed is off is following people on other instances if you're not looking at them via your instance website Identity not being perfectly transferrable on mastodon. You can post a special "follow me there instead" post, but what if your instance went tyrant and wouldn't let you post it? Or just went offline? I think cryptographic identity would be more robust for that, but it would also mean user having to store private key somewhere, which would be even less user-friendly

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 3 points 5 hours ago

I like to follow a couple reporters directly as opposed to subscribing to the local paper and wading through the fluff pieces, so that means using Bluesky.

Back when I was still an artist for my super niche internet garbage, that meant using Tumblr, then after the Tumblr purge, Twitter. Then after Musk, cohost, then after cohost... I mean, I was done with art but I'd probably be on Bluesky for that too.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

Because all their contacts and photos are already there.

[–] kobra@lemm.ee 18 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)
  1. Ease of use

The combination of having to choose an instance and then start with an algorithm free blank slate is a tough ask. It literally takes time to sit down and setup your initial “feed”, which is probably a good thing, but not at all what attracts users whimsical curiosities nor what they’ve experienced over their entire existence with social media.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Jimius@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 hours ago

This. And some people just want to post in front of a crowd. So far I like Lemmy because there's more conversation going on. And less "Look at me!" posts.

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think the average user thinks much about the platform they're on, and about who controls it. I think they go to wherever most of their family/friends are.

Also, those platforms are firmly in the mainstream, the alternatives aren't really - you'd have to actively go search for them. People just aren't likely to do that, I don't think.

[–] Swarfega@lemm.ee 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Most people are like sheep and just follow the herd.

[–] MiniMoose4Free@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago

All but you always get those people that swear they're different.

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 38 points 12 hours ago

In my IT program at school, the only people who have heard of the fediverse are the ones I've told.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 24 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I don’t think federation vs centralization is the primary differentiator. I think corporate vs non-profit/ad-free/donation-only/volunteerism is. Our marketing budget is goose egg. It’s all word-of-mouth.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I keep pushing for join-lemmy.org to buy ads on Google and Bing.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I can also see some people being opposed to them spending the donation money on ads, since they'd be giving money to companies that may be in opposition to what we're doing here (or ideological reasons around the advertising industry in general).

Maybe if there was a separate pool of donations specifically for advertising, then people who want to support that can donate to it? Those who don't can still donate to the projects themselves

[–] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 hours ago

Ads on the street (like at bus stops) could work well too

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

People follow the crowd and centralized media had considerably bigger crowds

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 8 points 10 hours ago

Several of these platforms used bots and/or multiple staff accounts to inflate user count/engagement to draw more people in and trigger the network effect.

[–] username_no_1@lemm.ee 17 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The more people using a social media platform, the more content there is to consume and people to interact with. It's really hard to move to a new platform when there just isn't as much stuff to consume as the centralized platforms like Reddit. I'm using Lemmy for ideological reasons, but if you just want to vibe and scroll online, Reddit has way more to offer. That said, the user experience of Reddit is continually degrading. Potentially at some point it will create enough refugees that sites like Lemmy hit an inflection point of users.

[–] pheet@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 hours ago

To add, e.g. reddit took years to become a great platform and it also degradation takes years, as the alternatives will also take years to build. Although some of the issues will probably follow too unless addressed some way. I don’t think the federation is a silver bullet but I’m hopefull that it’s a big step forward.

[–] Lasagna@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago

100%. Lemmy just happens to have the communities I’m interested in.

I remember trying to move to Mastodon years ago. But the main topics in my feed were furries, transgenders and activists.

Not hating on any of those, but it just wasn’t what I was interested in at the time, so I quit the whole microblogging thing altogether and spent more time on Reddit.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Because they actually have content and friends there

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago

friends on reddit?

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 8 points 12 hours ago

Sounds like a question for them.

[–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Do you want them here? I don’t. I don’t tell a soul about lemmy, because this is place for me to get away from them. A place for mostly rational discussion, populated by people free thinking enough to seek an alternative. If the masses descended on Lemmy, they’d ruin it like they ruin everything else. They’d draw the attention that would lead to it being litigated, regulated, purchased, corporatized etc. Let them stay on Facebook and Reddit.

[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

This sounds like a very gatekeeper and elitist mentality. Also, Lemmy is FLOSS, they can't buy it up or destroy it.

[–] Fecundpossum@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

The current US administration and its demagogues and lackeys have been doing all sorts of things they shouldn’t be able to do in a normal society. You’d be amazed at how quickly they’d be able to shut down a form of mass media they can’t control.

It’s fine if you don’t like my mentality. I’m highly selective about who I let into to my day to day life in meatspace. I like small gatherings, and keep a high bar for who I want to associate with. I don’t see why I shouldn’t apply the same principle to my internet life.

[–] Kng@feddit.rocks 4 points 11 hours ago

Part of it is just the network effect. If the people they want to follow are on twitter then they do not really have a choice. Also part of it is the algorithms. For some needing to manually select communities or individuals is an inconvenience. Finally I feel like fedi communities have a very distinct atmosphere simply because very few people use it. This can all change in the future but the majority of the issues stem from just not having enough creators and users as well as the additional effort required to use these platforms.

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

convenience, marketing

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works -3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Lazy. Most people don't want to learn how shit works. They just want it to work. They'll get what they pay for in the end.

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Hardcore facebookers don't care even if zuck fed babies to pet lion every morning. TikTokers are even worse. Clout is what they are and that's all they care about. Switching to an another system is a no go and if you bring it up they get really pissy.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

The fediverse needs to be plug and play. Blaming non techy users is a cop out.