this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
78 points (98.8% liked)

Games

16719 readers
467 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Part of the settlement requirements should be that Epic has to contact every account that is eligible to inform them of this.

Otherwise, as with so many suits and class actions like this, most will never know they are entitled to compensation.

[–] SlowNPC@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd hate to miss out on my $0.86

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It is closer to $7 per account, still not a massive amount but...

If you don't get it, someone must get the $245M.

The law firm will happily accept it as admin fees instead.

[–] DeriHunter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their child made charges to a credit card without parental knowledge or consent between January 2017 to November 2018

How can you prove that the purchase made by your child and not you?

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It world definately be hard to prove it. One would be purchases made while actively playing the game, and if you had an alibi by being at work or something as a parent, and the network/ip used to be purchase it doesnt match the network at work, at least the general area.

Theyll probably find a way.

[–] DeriHunter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah that a good alibi if it was purchased early and you can prove that you've been in the office at that time. What happens if it happen in the evening, and a lot of people are from home so its not a strong argument. Uterine what they'll do in this situation

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hence one, my example doesnt cover all situations, and definately not my job to look for the cover of all situations.

[–] DeriHunter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Didn't exacted you to provide answers, as you said it's not your job :) I was just wondering and engaged with a conversation