this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
113 points (86.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

2633 readers
314 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I haven't used a clock in years that I need to manually reset. Older people don't seem to realize clocks on phones and other devices reset automatically.

(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheMagicRat@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

There was a period of time when some devices did the change automatically, while others needed you to manually do it. Given that you could be late for something important, it makes sense to check whether your devices are up to date. For example, my phone will change it on its own, but my fitness tracker needs to sync with my phone to do it, so it would be easy to forget and find myself running to a late appointment.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All the clocks in my house became correct today. You think I'm changing them twice a year when I can just subtract one??

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

my only manually-set clock is correct again. well, it's off 12 hours and flashes but the numbers are right.

power went out for a few seconds a number of years ago at exactly 12noon (they switched over some equipment or something; a planned event). never bothered to 'set' the time since i don't use its alarm anymore anyway.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

i do similarly, i remind people this is nonsense and we shouldn't be changing ours clocks automatically or otherwise twice a year

[–] thisismyhaendel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Haha I almost 100% agree. Alas I do have a stove and microwave clock that requires resetting but it’s kind of hilariously obvious that I need to update them each time. I come into the kitchen and think “oh yeah…” :D

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I'm 42 years old, and I have a fairly new watch, a Casio WS-1300H. Made in like 2022 I think. It's not smart, if anything it's just as dumb as a watch from 30 years ago.

But it runs on a button cell battery, said to have a battery life of like 10 years, as long as you don't use the backlight too often.

Yes, I had to manually change the option for Daylight Savings Time, but they make it really easy to do, it's all in the manual.

https://www.casio.com/za/watches/casio/product.WS-1300H-8AV/

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My car's clock needs manual resetting, so does my old radio alarm that turns on NPR in the morning. Coffeemaker, microwave, and oven all have clocks, and the wall clock of course. Most of these, I never use as a precise time reference, because they run slow or fast. They're more for timing food or laundry, or counting the seconds while I grind coffee.... Except one day I will glance and think I have a lot more time than I really do, so best to make sure they are at least close to correct.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Always remember: those run fast or slow because the company that made it was super cheap. Devices hooked to 120vac have a stable time reference.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't afford a more expensive minivan just to keep the clock from gaining time. It already cost way too much because it's wheelchair modified. Same for the appliance clocks, which are only there so the timer will function.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

My doctor is younger than me, and she wouldn't shut up about needing to change the clocks.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

My car has two clocks and one automatically changes (I assume CarPlay) and the other has a setting that turn dst on or off.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My car clock needs moving still, and it's slower because it's analogue for some reason

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Even Doc Brown had to change the clock in his car.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's probably not exactly analog, it's probably still quartz crystal digital, even if it displays as an analog clock with hands.

Pictures speak a thousand words...

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its 40C outside (over 110F) so im not going to take a photo. It has physical hands, although i don't know if that means anything.

If you truly care to find out, the car is a Nissan Skyline 370 GT.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

May I ask year model?

I'm almost certain that even with mechanical clock hands, it's still almost certainly timed by a quartz crystal these days, and even for the past 30+ years.

The quartz crystal is usually supposed to 'tick' at a rate of 32,768 cycles per second, but not all quartz crystal timers are made to perfect timing.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›