this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
41 points (84.7% liked)

Star Trek

10608 readers
30 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-14 LD 5x05 "Starbase 80?!"
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angles"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissue Quest"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know who greenlit this supposed celebration of TAS, but the writing is cheap, lowbrow and cringey. It's a total shame that the amazing animation and sound design are paired with this quality of writing. None of the three eps released so far impressed me.

I'm seriously shocked by the Youtube comments that found it funny. The latest one is literally supposed to be funny because it involves boogers. Paramount should be ashamed it spent money on this. Have they stopped for a moment to think if this is what TAS fans want? /rant

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Have they stopped for a moment to think if this is what TAS fans want?

No.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've seen some good reviews of the first couple - I think you have to be into a very specific type of Adult Swim-type humour that was in style about 15 years ago - but the only review I've seen of the latest one was not positive (and this was from a reviewer who quite enjoyed last week's instalment).

But whatever, they're ultimately inconsequential, having been described by Paramount from the very start as "promotional shorts".

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, so far I think they're all a bit safer than the typical Adult-swim style humor of that era, with the possible exception of the guy's intestines falling out in the second one. I get the impression sometimes that modern Trek is pushed by Paramount not to offend too much, and I kinda wish these shorts could have been truly ridiculous. For example, IMO the booger people joke could have been more impactful if they were either:

  • Doing something truly and shocklingly horrendous
  • Doing something so minor and inconsequential that Riker comes across as extremely petty

That said, it's hard for me to get upset over a three minute web video not being hilarious enough or whatever. You could add them all up and it will still be less time that I spent watching "Code of Honor" so in that regard I have zero complaints.

[–] ieightpi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah they are pretty dumb. I've come to the conclusion that they were written by new writers, getting their feet wet....or something idk.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As an aside, I encourage everyone to check out the accompanying comics - they're not exactly deep, but I'm finding them much more entertaining than the actual shorts - they're basically a Star Trekkification of "Duck Amuck".

Issue 1

Issue 2

Issue 3

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think 2 and 3 are the same link

That was a test - you passed.

[–] jaelisp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

It very much feels like someone on the outside looking in and making jokes with their passing knowledge. In contrast to Lower Decks very much being injokes from people who love the series, it's philosophy and all its tiny details. They should have just given it to writers on Lower Decks. This makes me cringe so much.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

It's like Teen Titans Go all over again

[–] jimternet@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This week’s just felt designed to annoy us, what with getting the ranks wrong and all. Let alone the totally un-Trek message.

[–] beefcat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i don’t think these are meant to have “Trek messages”, if anything the point is to lampoon them by taking various Trek tropes to comical extremes (Spock misunderstanding human emotions, cultural acceptance, etc.)

for ~3 minute shorts on YouTube, i think that is fine even if it is not everyone’s cup of tea.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It's probably written by AI.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's very transparently not meant to appeal to existing Trek fans, not that it's unenjoyable for all of them. It's outreach.