this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
549 points (93.5% liked)

memes

12777 readers
3322 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 117 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Passkeys are a great idea, but everyone involved seems like they want the process to be as much of a pain in the dick as possible. So until the industry pulls it's collective head out of its collective ass (not going to hold my breath on that one), it'll be passwords+2FA for me.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It feels like everyone is trying to tie people to their platform. Oh, and also use the opportunity to force shit like "no custom ROMs or bootloader unlocking" on Android at the same time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] casmael@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hate 2fa so much, I never thought they would come up with anything more irritating. Little did I know.

[–] perfectly_boiled_pizza@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I really like 2FA as long as it's TOTP and I can use an offline app or program for it. It just works and is very easy and secure.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Jesus Christ, dude, that is exactly it.

We're trying to implement passkeys at work and the testing has been an absolute nightmare. Literally have no control over the onboarding experience because each tech giant is clamoring over each other, interjecting into the process to be the "home" for your passkeys. It's bananas.

When it's all set up, it's kinda great! But getting set up in the first place is an exercise in frustration.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

It's a chance for them to lock you (normies) into their platform forever. They're not going to give that up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What's wrong with passkeys? I'm in love with passwordless sign-in with yubikey, so much easier and faster than password + totp

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 54 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It’s shitty user experience when forced to dig out my phone to authenticate myself to a site I barely give half a shit about.

Like I wouldn’t even have an account if it wasn’t forced, and now you assholes want my phone too?

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you're describing SMS passcode, totp or other such factors.

Passcode doesn't require phone necessarily, but you can use it too

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

A lot of the stuff that has implemented passkeys so far are on mobile. And I mean the apps serving them out, not things you authenticate to.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

BitWarden has a desktop extension and it also handles 2FA. No reason to be using a password, which is way less secure and can be extracted from a website DB via a hack.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In store my passkeys in my password manager, which has a desktop app to access passkeys. What are you using that you have to always use your phone?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't like how there isn't a nice, cross-platform and secure way to sync my keys. Not all services allow multiple keys to exist at once.

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The syncing of keys allows for much greater attack surface.

Its being worked on right now but the standard hasn't been finalized yet.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

Until exporting and syncing keys is properly implemented, passkeys can go kick rocks.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Bitwarden syncs passkeys.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tabularasa@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The amount of people in this thread that don't understand passkeys surprises me. This is Lemmy. Aren't we the technical Linux nerds of the Internet?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (14 children)

2FA is just dead simple. I contact you, you contact me, handshake achieved. If you call me out of the blue I raise the alarm. If you get a login attempt with a failed handshake you raise the alarm.

Putting it all behind a pop up screen just isn't trustworthy to the human brain.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

SMS 2FA is notoriously compromised by various means.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (12 children)

There's been a lot of pain in the attempt to portray it as "Just click the passkey button, and that's it! Your login is secured for life!"

No - Buddy. It is secured for this one specific device that I have biometric authentication for. What about my computer? What about my other computer that isn't on the same operating system? I have a password manager that stores these things, why didn't you save to that when I registered? Why is it trying to take this shit from my Apple Keychain when it's in Bitwarden?

And, the next ultra-big step: How would a non-techie figure this shit out?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Passkeys are light years ahead of 2fA in user experience. Why do you dislike them?

Security based on devices is one of the positive innovations of smartphones and perhaps the only area where they've improved over the desktop experience.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I very specifically don't want my security tied to my device. Trying to migrate to new phones, and keeping things synced between a phone, desktop, and laptop is why I long ago moved to a password manager. Now, especially in the phone space, getting passkeys to function fully with a password manager ranges from "pain in the ass" to "not actually possible".

[–] quokka1@mastodon.au 1 points 1 day ago

@IrateAnteater @yesman if they do the "show secret" or whatever the option is called when your 2FA setup shows a QR code then you can copy that plain-text and save it somewhere (safe!) to just plumb it in to whatever authenticator app you decide to use elsewhere.
If you use something like BitWarden then it can generate those 2FA codes for you and sync between whichever devices you use.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I had a botched phone battery replacement once resulting in the phone getting replaced very unexpectedly. It was a nightmare trying to get everything back together because I stupidly used google authenticator, which is tied to the specific phone it’s on. Not tying it to the device is the way to go.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 4am@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Bitwarden: “I’m literally right here”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Heard of so many people losing their phone. Then they try to log into something and the company (quite often google) says "I don't give a fuck if you know your passwords I'm never letting you log into your account get fucked, don't call I won't answer"

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why would I want security based on a device? What security this offers greater than a 64 chars password + 2FA?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Passkeys are one exception to the familiar pattern of "we give you more SeCuRiTY so we can spy on you more and control your behaviour better". They actually are more secure. Problem is, a lot of technical issues with it still, a ton of stuff not working correctly yet

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] airportline@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago

You can store passkeys in your password manager lol

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago

On the contrary i want more services using passkeys instead of 2fa methods that are less secure (sms).

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

bitches don't know bout my dick

Bitches don't know bout my awesome passkeys. It's like ssh key authentication for web apps. Just save the passkeys to my password manager & presto: use same keys on all my devices.

It replaces opening a TOTP app to copy a token with a click to select the passkey in a prompt from my password manager.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darvit@lemmy.darvit.nl 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ITT: people who think only SMS, email and TOTP exist as 2FA.

And people who think only your phone can be used as passkey.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] geoff@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago

I use passkeys through 1Password and it’s vastly less irritating to me than anything involving passwords, especially 2fa. I really don’t like having to wait for email to arrive or copying down digits from a text message, which seems to be how 2fa typically works 90% of the time.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I briefly looked into passkeys a while ago, but I think I remember really disliking them because they just seemed like another excuse for companies to lock you in.

Has this changed? With Bitwarden + passwords, I can change to any platform, any device, at any time, and instantly get all my creds moved over securely.

I don't want to be in a situation where I'm locked into using Android, Chrome, iOS, or whatever because I can't move my creds.

[–] alphapuggle@programming.dev 26 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Bitwarden has passkey support! Syncs too!

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unless I've missed something big, passkeys are pretty easy for me if the website supports them imo.

Using KeePassXC, I click register on the website, register the passkey with KeePass, then it just works when I need to authenticate or login. My database is then synced across all my devices.

Passkey support is yet to come to KeePassDX on Android though, so I'll be awaiting that feature

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not for your security, it's for the company's. People suuuuuuuuck when it comes to credentials.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

My company insists on expiring passwords every 28 days, and prevents reuse of the last 24 passwords. Passwords must be 14+ characters long, with forced minimum complexity requirements. All systems automatically lock or logout after 10 minutes of inactivity, so users are forced to type in their credentials frequently throughout the day.

Yes people suck with creating decent credentials, but it's the company's security policies breeding that behavior.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago

I don't get why people get upset at frequently expiring passwords. It's not hard: just write it on a postit note and stick it on your monitor.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Boozilla@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Remember when tap-to-pay was new and didn't work at a lot of places and some people were freaked out over it?

And now most of us use it without a 2nd thought.

I speculate passkeys will be like that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought passkeys were supposed to be more secure?

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 13 points 1 week ago

They're using the same standard as FIDO2 / WebAuthn hardware security keys. The protocol is phishing resistant, unlike TOTP and similar one time code solutions.

I prefer the physical ones, because they're easy to organize. Passkey synchronization can be annoying.

[–] finkrat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Passkey is "something you own" right?

I have something I own, it's a Yubikey

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

sure, you can use a passkey as a primary authentication, but only "a device" or "system"(keypass/1pass etc) knows the passkey detail. with only passkey, if my passkey provider/ device is compromised then everything is lost. having single factor auth seems like a bad idea.

a password is something that I can know, so is still useful as a protection mechanism. having two factor auth should include password and passkey, which seems entirely reasonable whilst also providing an easier path forward for people used to TOTP.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 week ago

Amazon fucking insisting every damn time I log in.

load more comments
view more: next ›