this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
755 points (95.5% liked)

Privacy

5277 readers
12 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Stolen from @vmstan

More analysis from @wiredfire:

It’s nothing to do with [difficulties in using multiple platforms]. It’s to do with the massive backlash they got on Fedi for their CEO being all Trumpy and somewhat horrible right wing. So they’ve run away because they were made to feel unwelcome on account of us not letting their BS fly.

Original screenshot is of the bio of https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy and wasn’t a post (that confused me for a sec).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 79 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

It’s to do with the massive backlash they got on Fedi

That makes no sense, considering the message in question was posted on Xitter, and the backlash they received was far worse and more public on Reddit, where they are directing their followers to go. It won't stop anyone from talking about them here.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 55 points 1 week ago (4 children)

But the backlash on Reddit could be contained!

  • Half of it was on their subreddit, which they have full control over
  • Half of it was on r/privacy, which got removed by a Proton fan.
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MissingInteger@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The message was on Xitter from Andy Yen, but it was highlight on Mastodon by Jonah from Privacyguides.
The official Proton account also tried to defend Andy Yen on Mastodon (and later deleted it).

Here the link to the thread on Mastodon.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ninmi@sopuli.xyz 68 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You'd think Fedi would be a good place to be active on from a privacy-conscious user-base perspective, but I think this is the second time they leave Fedi? Either way, I guess being on Reddit allows them to moderate all the naysayers away.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 35 points 1 week ago (6 children)

There are a lot of advantages to the fediverse, but privacy really isn’t one of them.

[–] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

True, but privacy conscious people tend to also be wary of concentrations of power in a platform, such as Reddit or Twitter. If you are aware of the issues with a closed system you tend to also be aware of privacy issues, security issues, state censorship, and so on, so the user base is more aware in the fediverse and if they are leaving for Reddit that really does say something. I won't be using their service, I feel very lucky to have found out about this before shifting as I was in the process of finding a stable email host and blending with the VPN seemed financially reasonable, guess I will stay with Mullvad and get a separate email provider.

[–] Ninmi@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

With ActivityPub specifically, I'm aware. Yet privacy-conscious people tend to congregate there as well, which was my point.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybr not exactly privacy, but as long as your instance admins doesn't leak you IP, you have much more privacy than on Reddit. There are no algorithms trying to show you relevent ads, because your account isn't tied to your identity (unless your instance admin is evil).

Also, most Lemmy instances allows Tor. Yay for anonymity.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 11 points 1 week ago

For me, the main advantage of the model is "you cannot conveniently observe everyone's activity from one place".

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Nobody thinks it is, but privacy-interested peope are more likely to congregate on an open and decentralized playform not controlled by the privacy-invading corpo megaghouls

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I made this basic comment about the CEO saying something pro-Trump and my comment got removed by a mod of /r/degoogle on the grounds that it wasn't factual.

Pretty infuriating.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You know I was like this close to getting proton VPN before this whole thing started. I've been researching for like 6 months to decide which one I was going to switch to. They were on the short list. Bullet dodged.

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

I just had signed up to de-Google as it looked like a good suite of drive/mail/vpn but I've just deleted the account citing this ass-hattery as the reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nul9o9@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I suggest Mullvad as an alternative to Protons VPN services.

[–] killabeezio@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, plenty of good VPN alternatives. Not so much for email though if you want encryption.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 8 points 1 week ago (9 children)

tuta.com seems a good option, I switched to them a few months ago and so far so good

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Seconded.

For anyone considering switching though, make sure:

  1. You don't need port forwarding (e.g. for faster P2P online gaming, or various other P2P services) since I don't believe they have it, or if they do it certainly doesn't work well
  2. You're okay with a smaller selection of servers, since Mullvad has less

I will say though, I found less sites throttled/blocked me on Mullvad in some cases, since Mullvad's IPs are less widely shared than Proton's, so that's a plus, but a few sites will have hard blocks on some VPN providers like Mullvad that they've made manual exclusions to for larger VPNs like Proton.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 22 points 1 week ago

At least we know where their loyalties actually lie, now.

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yeah, their Linux dev team consists of two people, who, I believe only handle Linux things as part of their responsibilities and there is no dedicated team. I’m not salty that people have been asking for a Linux drive client for 4 years and the only response came this year saying ‘there’s only two people we’re focused on mail and vpn clients at the moment’.

Not trying to take away from Yen saying dumb shit with the company account or any of the mounting criticisms they’ve earned of late. Just a point toward their explanation not actually being too far out of the realm of possibility. And the likelihood of their PR/Social Media team being similarly small to the point of being understaffed.

Like yeah, is this needlessly antagonistic and blunt? Sure, but that feels more down to bad copy than the actual intent and direction of a companies PR dept, right?

“Due to a need for consolidation in the face of limited resources we will no longer be able to maintain the scope of our current social media presence. This account will remain active and be updated automatically but for the foreseeable future it will be unmonitored. Please join us on Reddit or contact support if you have any questions! Thanks Mastodon, toot on!”

Explains more clearly the logistical need to limit focus without disregarding the importance of the community. Someone hire me, I need a job. Leaves the account open to be reactivated some day and there’s no reason they couldn’t automate posting there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not on the exit proton bandwagon. All CEOs are awful and I don't have the energy to do the vote-with-your-dollars ethical consumption dance every time we're freshly reminded of that fact. Especially not with the only service out there that packages data integrity, privacy, and ease of use in a complete suite at the level that proton does.

[–] green@feddit.nl 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've said this before and I'll say this a million times again, capitalism is simply not viable. The main mechanism to punish bad business practice (using a different business) also hurts the significantly weaker consumer; meaning it will almost never be used properly.

I point this out here because I agree with your stance and cannot stand the "vote with your wallet" nonsense people pretends works.

This makes it really difficult to navigate the privacy space because eventually a cornerstone like Proton is "corrupted" and we have no way to correct it. We seriously need people thinking about solutions to this problem, or we'll be going nowhere fast.

[–] rascalnikov@literature.cafe 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

If you might allow me to disagree with you slightly...

The key to this, as in many things, is balance; in ALL things. Voting with your wallet does work, its a form of influencing and controlling the direction of the capital. It just doesn't work in a long term sense because people stop there; like boycotting. It is hard to boycott a company that has a monopoly on a market that has become a necessity, even if it's only a necessity to a niche community.

The key is, that you spend on smaller businesses, that are closer to the consumer than at large conglomerates. If there is none for the market, create one and encourage people to support your business that doesn't have any political ties yet. For example, I live in a capitol city, and my neighbor a few houses down has started a small chicken coop in their back yard; i began buying my eggs from them as its much cheaper and I don't have to worry about my funds being reallocated in support of something that would harm me or my community as they are a part of my community. Also, I deliver pizza as a third job for a small, mom and pops place and encourage those political minded people to spend money there as the pizza is made with fresh ingredients and made there. Takes a bit longer but we are too small to allocate funds to political matters and organizations; we do small events for the schools in the community but that is about it.

Once said businesses start to grow too big, rinse and repeat. Find another small business and support them. As support dwindles from a company that is growing too large, their options become more and more limited.

This seems not to work due to peoples mindset and preferring convenience over meaningful spending; which is something that I know not how to combat. What say you, friends?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gnygnygny@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago

fuck proton. finally started moving to it from gmail like a month ago. then the ceo thing happened, now this. good thing i only changed email to a few places so i can immediately steer away...

[–] ReadyUser31@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I found this site useful. The list of alternatives is very large.

From my looking around at other info and advice, I'd say that Posteo is the best one if you don't have custom domains; and that mailbox.org or possibly Tuta mail is best if do need a custom domain. Tuta is probably best if you need it to be free.

Another solid option not on that list is fastmail.fm (which is Australian).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 18 points 1 week ago

I get tired of being so right all of the time

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I was tempted to cancel after the CEO comments on politics, Reddit is a bit much though.

Reddit privacy policy is dog shit, having a company advertise privacy and use Reddit is comical

[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Is it time to change VPN platforms?

ProtonVPN has more servers, so its less likely to be blocked than Mullvad or IVPN. When I was using ProtonVPN I see much less "Log in to prove you are not a bot" or the reddit snoo avatar getting mad at me for using a VPN (there are still Movies and TV discussions I'd like to read).

Nevertheless, I'm currently using IVPN, I'm not sure if I'm staying tho.

Also: For people in authoritarian countries (like actual ones that already censored the internet), it would be difficult to pay for a VPN since banks would also block the transaction and cryptocurrency is likely also banned, so ProtonVPN's free tier is their only choice. (I'm not in a country that has censorship yet, but just want to mention that some people are in that situation)

Also Mullvad is slow, I recommend IVPN over Mullvad.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

The ONLY reason I have Proton email, is because my bank thinks it's the only secure email in the world...

[–] B0NK3RS@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Are those people who have been quoted supposed to be significant to the privacy community?

I've looked through the links provided and read a couple articles (one is titled "Does Proton really support Trump? A deeper analysis and surprising findings" and it is all very he said/she said with almost nothing to back anything or anyone up...

I'll gladly read more if anyone has info?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The most significant quote is from Proton itself, which made an official statement in favor of Republican and JD Vance.

I haven't seen many people simply post archives to the now-deleted contents of what Proton said, which is pretty damning in its own right. Before Proton realized their mistake, started erasing their original replies, and crafting a much less damning-looking narrative.

I've reviewed the article that tries to ascertain Andy Yen's politics (as if doing this would have been less weird if it was unabashed love of Democrats) and I agree it's pretty bad in several ways.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

This is good news. It means we aren't monitizeable enough.

load more comments
view more: next ›